The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relative encryption overhead in 802.11g network
Abstract
We present a performance study of security overheads in 802.11g networks. At 54 Mbps, the security overhead becomes significant in single client scenarios for many of the popular security protocols. However, we find that the most secure protocol, WPA-2, is also the protocol with the lowest security overhead.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to research done by Tripathi and Damani [21], there is lower average throughput and greater overhead when using WPA-TKIP when compared to the throughput and overhead when using WEP.”
From A Comprehensive Attack Flow Model and Security Analysis for Wi-Fi and WPA3 (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
The final nail in WEP's coffin
Bittau, A., Handley, M. J., & Lackey, J. (2006) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy/Proceedings of the ... IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2006.40 · Cited by 165
IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN security performance using multiple clients
Baghaei, N., & Hunt, R. (2005) · The ... IEEE International Conference on Networks/The IEEE International Conference on Networks · doi:10.1109/icon.2004.1409151 · Cited by 49
Performance investigation of secure 802.11 wireless LANs : raising the security bar to which level?
Wong, J. (2003) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/5541 · Cited by 7
Analyzing Wireless LAN Security Overhead
McCarter, H. L. (2006) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 0, Iperf
- wijesinha, 2005, throughput measurement for udp traffic in an ieee 802.11g lan, Proc 6th IntI Conf on Software Engineering Artificial Intelligence Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing and First ACIS International Workshop on Self-Assembling Wireless Networks (SNPD/SAWN'05)
- wijesinha, 2005, throughput measurement for udp traffic in an ieee 802.11g lan, Proc 6th IntI Conf on Software Engineering Artificial Intelligence Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing and First ACIS International Workshop on Self-Assembling Wireless Networks (SNPD/SAWN'05)
- atheros, 0, Methodology for Testing Wireless LAN Performance
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Attack Flow Model and Security Analysis for Wi-Fi and WPA3
Kohlios, C. P., & Hayajneh, T. (2018) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics7110284 · Cited by 77
“According to research done by Tripathi and Damani [21], there is lower average throughput and greater overhead when using WPA-TKIP when compared to the throughput and overhead when using WEP.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Tripathi, A., & Damani, O. P.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
- ORCID
- Damani, Om P.
- Venue
- 2008 International Symposium on Telecommunications
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-08
- Pages
- 420-423
- OpenAlex
- W2137378870
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Symposium on Telecommunications (publishedVersion)
- DSpace (IIT Bombay) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Keywords
- encryption overhead, IEEE 802.11g, wireless LAN security, security protocols, throughput
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
