Qualitative study to identify icons characteristics on mobile phones applications interfaces
Abstract
Modern mobile phone applications offer much support to various age group users. Unfortunately, there are still issues with the interfaces in terms of its learnability. Many users find it hard to learn and use the modern mobile phone application interfaces. Despite a lot of ongoing research examining the mobile phone applications interfaces learnability issues, very little research has explored on the difficulty faced by the users when interacting with graphical icons, the most important element of an interface. This paper presents an exploratory study to identify which icons characteristics support the initial icon usability for various age group users. Twenty five (25) test participants from two different age groups took part in the study. The first group consists of 12 younger adults (age 20-40) and the second consists of 13 older adults (age 50+). From the study findings, both age group users stated that there are issues with the existing mobile phone applications interfaces. The study reveals that specific icon characteristics - complexity (i.e. how difficult is icon to identify and interpret), familiarity (how familiar are users with the icon) and semantic distance could improve icon learnability. This led to a discussion on how the findings could help mobile phone application interface developers to develop mobile phone icons that best suits to the requirements of various age group users.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Malaysian users could interpret more concrete icons than abstract icons, whereas Estonian users performed better with abstract icons.
“The results found that Malaysian users could interpret more concrete icons than abstract icons, whereas Estonian users performed better with abstract icons [72].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [72]
Studies show the effect of age on icon usability.
“The studies of Gatsou et al. [65], Leung et al. [64], Ghayas et al. [72], and Koutsourelakis and Chorianopoulos [75] show the effect of age on icon usability.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [72]
Visual complexity affected icon usability for senior users.
“Ghayas et al. [72] also found that visual complexity affected icon usability for senior users.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
Age-related differences in the initial usability of mobile device icons
Leung, R., McGrenere, J., & Graf, P. (2011) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290903171308 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review
Punchoojit, L., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2017) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2017/6787504 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ghayas, S., Sulaiman, S., Khan, M., & Jaafar, J.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY)
- COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology & Applications (ISWTA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-09
- Pages
- 310-315
- OpenAlex
- W1964469031
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology & Applications (ISWTA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Safety Warnings and Signage
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- mobile application, semantic distance, older adults, age differences, usability, user interface design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review