Cited by 5Usability and User Interface DesignSafety Warnings and SignageInteractive and Immersive Displays

Qualitative study to identify icons characteristics on mobile phones applications interfaces

Ghayas, Syed, Sulaiman, Suziah, Khan, Muzafar, Jaafar, Jafreezal·2013·2013 IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology & Applications (ISWTA)

Abstract

Modern mobile phone applications offer much support to various age group users. Unfortunately, there are still issues with the interfaces in terms of its learnability. Many users find it hard to learn and use the modern mobile phone application interfaces. Despite a lot of ongoing research examining the mobile phone applications interfaces learnability issues, very little research has explored on the difficulty faced by the users when interacting with graphical icons, the most important element of an interface. This paper presents an exploratory study to identify which icons characteristics support the initial icon usability for various age group users. Twenty five (25) test participants from two different age groups took part in the study. The first group consists of 12 younger adults (age 20-40) and the second consists of 13 older adults (age 50+). From the study findings, both age group users stated that there are issues with the existing mobile phone applications interfaces. The study reveals that specific icon characteristics - complexity (i.e. how difficult is icon to identify and interpret), familiarity (how familiar are users with the icon) and semantic distance could improve icon learnability. This led to a discussion on how the findings could help mobile phone application interface developers to develop mobile phone icons that best suits to the requirements of various age group users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iswta.2013.6688794

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghayas, S., Sulaiman, S., Khan, M., & Jaafar, J.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY)
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Venue
2013 IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology & Applications (ISWTA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-09
Pages
310-315
OpenAlex
W1964469031
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Symposium on Wireless Technology & Applications (ISWTA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Safety Warnings and Signage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
mobile application, semantic distance, older adults, age differences, usability, user interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review