Cited by 102Technology Use by Older AdultsUsability and User Interface DesignSafety Warnings and Signage

Age-related differences in the initial usability of mobile device icons

Leung, Rock, McGrenere, Joanna, Graf, Peter·2011·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

Mobile devices offer much potential to support older adults (age 65+). However, older adults have been relatively slow to adopt mobile devices. Although much ongoing HCI research has examined usability problems to address this issue, little work has looked at whether existing graphical icons are harder to use for this population compared with younger adults. We conducted a qualitative exploratory study and a follow-up experimental study to determine which icon characteristics help initial icon usability for older adults. We found that our older participants did have more problems using existing mobile device icons, but that particular icon characteristics – semantically close meaning (i.e. natural, close link between depicted objects and associated function), familiar, labelled and concrete (i.e. those depicting real-world objects) – improved icon usability for them. We discuss how these findings can help icon designers to create mobile device icons that are more suited to the abilities and technology experience of older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01449290903171308

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial ability, verbal memory, and self-efficacy of younger users were significantly higher than older users in preliminary tests.

    “The results of the preliminary tests indicated that spatial ability, verbal memory, and self-efficacy of younger users were significantly higher than older users.”
  • More than half of the older users in Arning and Ziefle's study were not able to build a mental model of how the system was constructed.

    “Although all older users in their study were experienced computer users, the study found that more than half of them were not able to build a mental model of how the system was constructed.”
  • The variable with the best predictive power for navigation performance was not age but spatial ability; age was only a carrier variable related to many variables that changed over the lifespan.

    “However, further analysis found that the variable which had the best predictive power for navigation performance was not age but spatial ability; age was only a carrier variable that was related to many variables which changed over the lifespan.”
  • Younger users outperformed older users on mobile menu navigation, with older users having significantly greater task completion time, number of tasks completed, detour steps, and nodes revisited.

    “Task completion time, number of tasks completed, detour steps, and nodes revisited of older users were significantly greater than those of younger users; in other words, younger users outperformed older users on mobile menu navigation [40].”
  • Both verbal memory and spatial ability were related to strategies employed in menu navigation.

    “Their study also found that both verbal memory and spatial ability were related to strategies employed in menu navigation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leung, R., McGrenere, J., & Graf, P.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Leung, Rock
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2011-09
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
629-642
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W2011111325
Cited by
102
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Safety Warnings and Signage
Keywords
older adults, age differences, icon design, semantic meaning, familiarity, technology adoption, user interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review