The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Validation of Design Concepts for Future EV-Traction Inverters
Abstract
Numerous ideas to improve traction inverters for future electric vehicles were presented in literature. However, fair experimental comparisons of these concepts are rare. In this work, three highly-relevant concepts for traction systems are compared experimentally to a reference 2-level silicon IGBT inverter with a dc-link voltage of 400V. First, the dc-link voltage is increased from 400V to 800V. Secondly, the replacement of silicon IGBTs with silicon carbide MOSFETs. Thirdly, the usage of a three-level inverter instead of two-levels. To ensure a fair comparison, four prototypes with a nominal power of 80kW were constructed with fully use of carry-over parts and tested on two different test benches. The comparison is carried out regarding efficiency, total harmonic distortion, electromagnetic emission and technology readiness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although reducing current results in lower conduction loss, higher voltage increases switching losses which usually reduce total efficiency if the same inverter technology is used [18].”
From A Review of Multilevel Inverter Topologies in Electric Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Higher voltage and lower current reduce conduction losses. On the other hand, switching losses increase as a result of increasing the DC input voltage [18].”
From A Review of Multilevel Inverter Topologies in Electric Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
A New Neutral-Point-Clamped PWM Inverter
Nabae, A., Takahashi, I., & Akagi, H. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.1981.4503992 · Cited by 5,151
Oswald, N., Anthony, P., McNeill, N., & Stark, B. H. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2013.2278919 · Cited by 517
Kaufhold, M., Aninger, H., Berth, M., et al. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/41.836355 · Cited by 314
Comparison Between Output CM Chokes for SiC Drive Operating at 20- and 200-kHz Switching Frequencies
Han, D., Morris, C. T., Lee, W., & Sarlioglu, B. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2017.2672919 · Cited by 124
Key Components of Modular Propulsion Systems for Next Generation Electric Vehicles
Stippich, A. (2017) · CPSS Transactions on Power Electronics and Applications · doi:10.24295/cpsstpea.2017.00023 · Cited by 121
Spatial Electro-Thermal Modeling and Simulation of Power Electronic Modules
van der Broeck, C. H., Ruppert, L. A., Hinz, A., et al. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2017.2757898 · Cited by 83
Parameterization of Three-Phase Electric Machine Models for EMI Simulation
Sun, J., & Xing, L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2013.2264750 · Cited by 75
Towards EMI prediction of a PM motor drive for automotive applications
Chen, S., Nehl, T. W., Lai, J., et al. (2003) · doi:10.1109/apec.2003.1179170 · Cited by 66
A Simulation Platform for Optimization of Electric Vehicles With Modular Drivetrain Topologies
Nemeth, T., Bubert, A., Becker, J., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · doi:10.1109/tte.2018.2869371 · Cited by 57
Self-citationA flexible test bench for power semiconductor switching loss measurements
Gottschlich, J., Kaymak, M., Christoph, M., et al. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS) · doi:10.1109/peds.2015.7203495 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- bubert, 2017, Comparison of B6C and NPC inverter topologies for electric vehicles, Power Electronics Specialists Conference (SPEC)
- oberdieck, 2018, Common- and differential-mode separators including the fm-broadcasting band, Conference for Power Electronics Intelligent Motion Renewable Energy and Energy Management (PCIM Europe)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of Multilevel Inverter Topologies in Electric Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends
Poorfakhraei, A., Narimani, M., & Emadi, A. (2021) · IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/ojpel.2021.3063550 · Cited by 424
“Although reducing current results in lower conduction loss, higher voltage increases switching losses which usually reduce total efficiency if the same inverter technology is used [18].”
BackgroundA Review of Modulation and Control Techniques for Multilevel Inverters in Traction Applications
Poorfakhraei, A., Narimani, M., & Emadi, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3056612 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Bubert, A., Oberdieck, K., Xu, H., & De Doncker, R. W.
- Affiliations
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-06
- Pages
- 795-802
- OpenAlex
- W2889404759
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (publishedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
- Keywords
- electric vehicle traction inverter, SiC MOSFET, three-level inverter, inverter efficiency, total harmonic distortion, electromagnetic emissions, technology readiness, prototype comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Validation of Design Concepts for Future EV-Traction Inverters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/itec.2018.8450253
- The paper
- Bubert, A., Oberdieck, K., Xu, H., & De Doncker, R. W. (2018). Experimental Validation of Design Concepts for Future EV-Traction Inverters. 2018 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC). https://doi.org/10.1109/itec.2018.8450253
