Cited by 8Cryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security SolutionsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

A Secure Cloud-Edge Collaborative Logistic Regression Model

Wang, Chen, Xu, Jian, Yin, Long·2021·2021 IEEE International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing & Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical & Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics)

Abstract

Outsourcing logical regression model to the cloud is highly beneficial, yet it will not only cause privacy issues due to the confidentiality of the data, but also cause bandwidth and computing burden for the cloud. In this paper, we design, implement and evaluate a new system that allows secure cloud-edge collaborative logistic regression model (SC-CLRM) based on multi-key fully homomorphic encryption (multi-key FHE). Our system significantly shifts the processing of the cloud to the edge and securely trains logistic regression model among multiple parties. We first propose a new scheme which uses the cloud server and edge node to jointly train logistic regression model over the ciphertext to ensure the security of data and classification model against the cloud server, and data source can go offline after providing the data. We further design security protocols based on multi-key FHE which supports multiple data sources and satisfies the semi-honest model security under outsourcing cloud computing. Performance evaluation demonstrates our new system can securely train the logistic regression model of multiple data sources, as well as share 41.72%~44.92% communication and 53.13%~60.99% computation overhead of the cloud.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ithings-greencom-cpscom-smartdata-cybermatics53846.2021.00049

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C., Xu, J., & Yin, L.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (CN)
Venue
2021 IEEE International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing & Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical & Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-12
Volume
57
Pages
244-253
OpenAlex
W4210747337
Cited by
8
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872069)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N2017012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
cloud-edge collaboration, multi-key fully homomorphic encryption, privacy-preserving data processing, edge computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review