Diabetic e-Management System (DEMS)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to describe a recent project in which Internet-ready handheld computers (personal digital assistants, PDAs) and custom software applications were used to help diabetes patients self manage their condition. The project research team is made up of professors and graduate students with backgrounds in information technology, nursing, and sociology who have an interest in using emerging technologies in healthcare applications. The researchers theorized that allowing diabetes patients to easily enter information about their daily activities (e.g. diet, exercise, blood sugar levels, and medications) into a handheld computer, and then immediately use a wireless network connection to upload that information to a central server for review by a medical professional would prove more useful than simply logging this information for the patient's own use. A seed grant was acquired, computer hardware was purchased, and a prototype system was developed. Thirteen individuals tested the prototype system and the users were qualitatively interviewed. The users were also presented with a 10-question survey based on the system usability scale (SUS)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SUS score of 84.0 is high compared with other studies where the SUS questionnaire was used, considering the average score together with the conclusion on usability in each study.
“This score is high compared with other studies where the SUS questionnaire was used, considering the average score together with the conclusion on usability in each study [55-57].”
From Long-Term Engagement With a Mobile Self-Management System for People With Type 2 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale
(1996) · Usability Evaluation In Industry · doi:10.1201/9781498710411-35 · Cited by 8,989 · see citing works
National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
Funnell, M. M., Brown, T. L., Childs, B. P., Haas, L. B., Hosey, G. M., Jensen, B., Maryniuk, M. D., Peyrot, M. F., Piette, J. D., Reader, D., et al. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-s087 · Cited by 1,348 · see citing works
A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability
Tullis, T. S., & Stetson, J. N. (2004) · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chomutare, T., Fernandez-Luque, L., Årsand, E., & Hartvigsen, G. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1874 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Gao, M., Kortum, P. T., & Oswald, F. L. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621322 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Measuring the Usability of Mobile Applications for Phones and Tablets
Kortum, P., & Sorber, M. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1064658 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Gronier, G., & Baudet, A. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1898828 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Long-Term Engagement With a Mobile Self-Management System for People With Type 2 Diabetes
Tatara, N., Årsand, E., Skrøvseth, S. O., & Hartvigsen, G. (2013) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.2432 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Berndt, R.-D., Takenga, C., Preik, P., Kuehn, S., Berndt, L., Mayer, H., Kaps, A., & Schiel, R. (2014) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm4020200 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
A Review of Mobile Terminal-Based Applications for Self-Management of Patients with Diabetes
Tatara, N., Årsand, E., Nilsen, H., & Hartvigsen, G. (2009) · 2009 International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine · doi:10.1109/etelemed.2009.14 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A Pilot Study on Usability Analysis of Emergency Department Information System by Nurses
Shapiro, J. S., Genes, N. G., Aguilar, M. V., Mohrer, D., Baumlin, K. M., Belden, J. L., & Kim, M. S. (2012) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2011-11-ra-0065 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Enabling Medication Management through Health Information Technology
(2011) · SciVee · doi:10.4016/37397.01 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
(2012) · The turkish online journal of educational technology · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Wireless and Mobile Technologies Improving Diabetes Self-Management
Årsand, E., Tatara, N., & Hartvigsen, G. (2011) · Handbook of Research on Mobility and Computing · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-042-6.ch009 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Design of a large scale community-based self-management system for diabetes mellitus.
Chan, K. C., Wong, L., & Chan, D. B. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Development, Technical, and User Evaluation of a Web Mobile Application for Self-Control of Diabetes
García-Zapirain, B., Díez, I. D. L. T., de Abajo, B. S., & López-Coronado, M. (2016) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2015.0233 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A Survey on Cloud Computing based Health Care for Diabetes: Analysis and Diagnosis
Kumar, D. P. S. J. (2015) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1496528 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Adaptive content-aware access control of EPR resource in a healthcare system
Sharathkumar, S., & Jagadamba, G. (2017) · International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) · doi:10.1109/icacci.2017.8125841 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Developing a wireless based dynamic management mechanism for intravenous drip scheduling
Chen, C. L., Hsieh, N. C., & Hung, L. P. (2015) · International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1504/ijahuc.2015.070585 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Rogers, M., & Baggili, I. (2009) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationFeature Based Rule Learner in Noisy Environment Using Neighbourhood Rough Set Model
Liu, Y., Jiao, L.-Y., Bai, G., & Feng, B. (2010) · International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence · doi:10.4018/jssci.2010040104 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Studying the Acceptance of a Digital Diabetes Diaries
Valdez, A. S. C., & Ziefle, M. (2019) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15736-4_8
Feature Based Rule Learner in Noisy Environment Using Neighbourhood Rough Set Model
Liu, Y., Jiao, L.-Y., Bai, G., & Feng, B. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0264-9.ch004
- Authors
- Lutes, K. D., & Baggili, I. M.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- ORCID
- Baggili, I.M.
- Venue
- Third International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG'06)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 619-624
- OpenAlex
- W2129251557
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- diabetes self-management, personal digital assistants, remote patient monitoring, system usability, prototype testing, diabetic patients
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
