Cited by 95Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

MODNet: Motion and Appearance based Moving Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving

Siam, Mennatullah, Mahgoub, Heba, Zahran, Mohamed, Yogamani, Senthil, Jagersand, Martin, El-Sallab, Ahmad·2018·2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)

Abstract

For autonomous driving, moving objects like vehicles and pedestrians are of critical importance as they primarily influence the maneuvering and braking of the car. Typically, they are detected by motion segmentation of dense optical flow augmented by a CNN based object detector for capturing semantics. In this paper, our aim is to jointly model motion and appearance cues in a single convolutional network. We propose a novel two-stream architecture for joint learning of object detection and motion segmentation. We designed three different flavors of our network to establish systematic comparison. It is shown that the joint training of tasks significantly improves accuracy compared to training them independently. Although motion segmentation has relatively fewer data than vehicle detection. The shared fusion encoder benefits from the joint training to learn a generalized representation. We created our own publicly available dataset (KITTI MOD) by extending KITTI object detection to obtain static/moving annotations on the vehicles. We compared against MPNet as a baseline, which is the current state of the art for CNN-based motion detection. It is shown that the proposed two-stream architecture improves the mAP score by 21.5% in KITTI MOD. We also evaluated our algorithm on the non-automotive DAVIS dataset and obtained accuracy close to the state-of-the-art performance. The proposed network runs at 8 fps on a Titan X GPU using a basic VGG16 encoder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/itsc.2018.8569744

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 95

Authors
Siam, M., Mahgoub, H., Zahran, M., Yogamani, S., Jagersand, M., & El-Sallab, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Cairo University (EG)
Venue
2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-11
Pages
2859-2864
OpenAlex
W2904631343
Cited by
95
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13
FWCI
3.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
moving object detection, autonomous driving, motion segmentation, optical flow, dual-stream architecture, shared encoder, vehicle detection, pedestrian detection, DAVIS dataset, real-time detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review