Cited by 117Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Vision and Imaging

OmniDet: Surround View Cameras Based Multi-Task Visual Perception Network for Autonomous Driving

Open access
Ravi Kumar, Varun, Yogamani, Senthil, Rashed, Hazem, Sitsu, Ganesh, Witt, Christian, Leang, Isabelle, Milz, Stefan, Mader, Patrick·2021·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

Surround View fisheye cameras are commonly deployed in automated driving for 360°near-field sensing around the vehicle. This work presents a multi-task visual perception network on unrectified fisheye images to enable the vehicle to sense its surrounding environment. It consists of six primary tasks necessary for an autonomous driving system: depth estimation, visual odometry, semantic segmentation, motion segmentation, object detection, and lens soiling detection. We demonstrate that the jointly trained model performs better than the respective single task versions. Our multi-task model has a shared encoder providing a significant computational advantage and has synergized decoders where tasks support each other. We propose a novel camera geometry based adaptation mechanism to encode the fisheye distortion model both at training and inference. This was crucial to enable training on the WoodScape dataset, comprised of data from different parts of the world collected by 12 different cameras mounted on three different cars with different intrinsics and viewpoints. Given that bounding boxes is not a good representation for distorted fisheye images, we also extend object detection to use a polygon with non-uniformly sampled vertices. We additionally evaluate our model on standard automotive datasets, namely KITTI and Cityscapes. We obtain the state-of-the-art results on KITTI for depth estimation and pose estimation tasks and competitive performance on the other tasks. We perform extensive ablation studies on various architecture choices and task weighting methodologies. A short video at https://youtu.be/xbSjZ5OfPes provides qualitative results.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

OmniDet is a multi-task visual perception network for unrectified surround-view fisheye cameras that jointly performs depth/distance estimation, visual odometry, semantic segmentation, motion segmentation, object detection, and lens soiling detection. It reports that joint training with a shared encoder and synergized decoders outperforms single-task baselines and achieves state-of-the-art KITTI depth and pose results among monocular methods.

Key findings

  • The final WoodScape OmniDet (SAN10-patch) model reports RMSE 1.210, δ<1.25 0.929, semantic mIoU 78.9, motion mIoU 79.2, and detection mAP 74.1, improving over its own ablations without the proposed components.
  • Multi-task learning outperformed single-task models on WoodScape, KITTI, and Cityscapes; for example, on WoodScape the multi-task setting reached distance RMSE 1.332, semantic mIoU 76.6, motion mIoU 75.3, and detection mAP 68.4, while single-task values included distance RMSE 1.681, semantic mIoU 72.5, motion mIoU 68.1, and detection mAP 63.5.
  • VarNorm task weighting gave the best WoodScape task-weighting result: Sq.Rel 0.046, Abs.Rel 0.276, semantic mIoU 76.6, motion mIoU 75.3, and detection mAP 68.4, compared with equal weighting at Sq.Rel 0.058, Abs.Rel 0.302, semantic mIoU 70.3, motion mIoU 67.3, and detection mAP 64.6.
  • On KITTI, OmniDet reports state-of-the-art monocular depth and pose results: depth Abs.Rel 0.092, Sq.Rel 0.657, RMSE 3.984 on the Eigen split, and pose errors of 0.009 ± 0.004 on sequence 09 and 0.008 ± 0.005 on sequence 10 with GT; with online refinement, depth improves to Abs.Rel 0.077, Sq.Rel 0.641, RMSE 3.859.

Methods

  • The model uses a shared self-attention encoder with task-specific decoders for six tasks on unrectified fisheye images: distance/depth, pose/visual odometry, semantic segmentation, motion segmentation, object detection, and soiling segmentation.
  • Key components include a camera geometry tensor to encode fisheye distortion and camera intrinsics, VarNorm variance-based task weighting, semantically guided distance and detection decoders via pixel-adaptive convolutions, dynamic-object masking from motion/semantic segmentation, and a 24-sided non-uniform polygon representation for fisheye object detection.
  • Training and evaluation use WoodScape (10,000 images split 6:1:3, 12 cameras, three cars), KITTI, and Cityscapes; the model is trained in PyTorch for 20 epochs with batch size 24 on a Titan RTX, and inference is measured with TensorRT FP16 on NVIDIA Jetson AGX.

Limitations

  • The paper states that scaling to more tasks still faces practical challenges: building a diverse and balanced dataset, corner case mining, stable training mechanisms, and designing an optimal map representation that combines all tasks while reducing post-processing.
  • The paper states that the soiling dataset is independently built and cannot be trained jointly in a traditional manner; the shared encoder is frozen and only the soiling decoder is trained, and asynchronous backpropagation achieved the same accuracy.
  • Evident from the text: polygon detection on raw fisheye is limited to only two classes, pedestrians and vehicles; motion labels for KITTI and Cityscapes are available only for the cars category; and additional proprietary data was used for pre-training and initialization on WoodScape.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2021.3062324

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 21 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    Feature-metric losses prevent the training objective from getting stuck at multiple local minima for homogeneous areas.

    “The main goal of these losses is to prevent the training objective from getting stuck at multiple local minima for homogeneous areas as fisheye images have considerably larger homogeneous areas than their rectilinear counterpart.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] source

      The Multi-scale Estimation section says multi-scale depth prediction and image reconstruction are used to keep training from getting stuck in local minima, and discusses ambiguity in large low-texture regions. It does not attribute that effect to feature-metric losses or compare homogeneous areas in fisheye and rectilinear images. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: Fisheye images have considerably larger homogeneous areas than their rectilinear counterpart.
  • Findingown data

    A multitask network with 6 tasks (5 diverse tasks) performs better than the equivalent single-task models on the evaluated datasets.

    “Quantitative results from our experiments indicate that a multitask network with 6 tasks, 5 diverse tasks perform better than the single task models along with our proposed synergies explained in Section III-B.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Adding the camera geometry tensor to the training setting significantly increases distance estimation accuracy.

    “When adding the camera geometry tensor to this setting, we observe a significant increase in accuracy since we train multiple cameras with different camera intrinsics and viewing angles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The novel fusion technique in OmniDet significantly improves the detection decoder's accuracy, as seen in Table I.

    “This novel fusion technique in our OmniDet framework significantly improves the detection decoder's accuracy, which can be seen in Table I.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Using semantically guided features in the detection decoder yields significant gains in mAP.

    “we use semantically guided features to the detection decoder as described in Section III-B2, which yields significant gains in mAP”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims. 24
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingcitation

    Using the online refinement method of Casser et al. yields a significant improvement in depth estimation.

    “Using the online refinement method from [42], we obtain a significant improvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] source

      The Conclusion (p. 8) attributes improved performance to sparse convolution modules, while Boosting Single-Image Depth Prediction (pp. 14–15) discusses training with different depth maps. Neither passage addresses Casser et al.’s online refinement method or an improvement from using it; searches for “Casser” and “online refinement” found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is minimal work in the area of fisheye perception; specifically, the only previous work on multi-task learning is FisheyeMultiNet, which discusses a more straightforward three-task network.

    “In general, there is minimal work in the area of fisheye perception.Specifically, there is only our previous work on multi-task learning: FisheyeMultiNet [6] which discusses a more straight forward three task network.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      The Related Work section discusses single-view depth prediction and networks that jointly predict depth and segmentation, but does not address how much work exists on fisheye perception. Searches for “fisheye,” “FisheyeMultiNet,” and fisheye multi-task learning found no passage identifying FisheyeMultiNet or describing a three-task network. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Shu et al. proposed a convergent loss to have a relatively large convergence radius to enable gradient descent from a remote distance.

    “Shu et al. [11] proposed a convergent loss to have a relatively large convergence radius to enable gradient descent from a remote distance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] source

      The Per-Pixel Minimum Reprojection Loss and Multi-scale Estimation sections describe Godard et al.’s depth-estimation losses, not a convergent loss proposed by Shu et al. Searches for “convergent loss,” “convergence radius,” and “Shu et al.” found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    VarNorm achieved the best results and was employed for all further experiments.

    “We employ the proposed VarNorm method for all the further experiments as it achieved the best results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Equal weighting is the worst, and the multi-task network performs better than the single-task networks by using any dynamic task weighting method presented.

    “As shown in Table III, equal weighting is the worst, and our multitask network performs better than the single task networks by using any dynamic task weighting method presented above.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the evaluated object detection representations, the 24-sided polygon achieves the highest ground-truth instance segmentation mIoU (86.6) and the highest network mIoU (44.6).

    “24-sided Polygon 86.6 44.6 48”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The jointly trained multi-task model performs better than the respective single-task versions, including a six-task model on WoodScape and a five-task model on KITTI and Cityscapes performing better than single-task baselines.

    “We demonstrate that the jointly trained model performs better than the respective single task versions.”
    • Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · plain
      “We showcase a six-task model on WoodScape and fivetask model on KITTI and Cityscapes performing better than the single task baselines.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The model obtains state-of-the-art results on KITTI for depth estimation and pose estimation among monocular methods and competitive performance on the other tasks.

    “We obtain the state-of-the-art results on KITTI for depth estimation and pose estimation tasks and competitive performance on the other tasks.”
    • Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · plain
      “We obtain state-of-the-art results for depth and pose estimation tasks on KITTI among monocular methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fisheye cameras have strong radial distortion that cannot be corrected without disadvantages, including reduced field-of-view and resampling distortion artifacts at the periphery.

    “Fisheye cameras have a strong radial distortion that cannot be corrected without disadvantages, including reduced field-of-view and resampling distortion artifacts at the periphery [1].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pedestrians and vehicles are non-rigid and diverse in appearance, unlike traffic lights and traffic signs, making them suitable for polygon regression.

    “Unlike traffic lights and traffic signs, these categories are non-rigid in nature and quite diverse in appearance, making them suitable for polygon regression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The contributed features and the synergy between tasks help OmniDet achieve good scene understanding with high accuracy in each task's predictions.

    “All our contributed features and the synergy between tasks help the OmniDet framework to achieve a good scene understanding with high accuracy in each task's predictions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Cylindrical rectification provides a good trade-off between loss of field-of-view and reducing distortion.

    “We also experiment using cylindrical rectification (Cyl Rect.), which provides a good trade-off between loss of field-of-view and reducing distortion [29].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sampling 24 points with high curvature values from each object instance contour helps regress better polygon shapes, because points at high curvature define the shape of the object contours.

    “Learning these points helps to regress better polygon shapes, as these points at high curvature define the shape of the object contours.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    As weights are shared in the Siamese encoder, the previous frame's encoder can be saved and re-used instead of re-computing.

    “As the weights are shared in the Siamese encoder, the previous frame's encoder can be saved and re-used instead of re-computing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Motion is a dominant cue in automotive scenes, and it requires at least two frames or the use of dense optical flow.

    “Motion is a dominant cue in automotive scenes, and it requires at least two frames or the use of dense optical flow [8].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The semantic and motion mask contribution has the potential to solve the infinite distance issue.

    “Additionally, this contribution possesses the potential to solve the infinite distance issue.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fisheye cameras are mounted low on a vehicle and are susceptible to lens soiling due to splashing of mud or water from the road.

    “Fisheye cameras are mounted low on a vehicle and are susceptible to lens soiling due to splashing of mud or water from the road.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Information about depth/distance of dynamic objects is essential in autonomous driving; otherwise, an infinite depth issue occurs during inference and contaminates reconstruction losses.

    “As dynamic objects violate the static world assumption, information about their depth/distance is essential in autonomous driving; else, we would encounter the infinite depth issue during the inference stage and incur contamination to the reconstruction losses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Dynamic objects violate the static world assumption.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The proposed approach can, in principle, be applied to any fisheye projection model of choice.

    “The proposed approach can, in principle, be applied to any fisheye projection model of choice explained in [1].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Generic object detection using geometric cues like motion or depth for rare objects complements the detection of standard objects and provides more robustness.

    “Thus, generic object detection using geometric cues like motion or depth for rare objects is typically used.They will also complement the detection of standard objects and provide more robustness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Semantic tasks typically require a large annotated dataset covering various objects, and it is infeasible to practically cover every possible object.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Self-supervised methods have recently dominated depth estimation, which has also been demonstrated on fisheye images.

    “Self-supervised methods have recently dominated depth estimation, which has also been demonstrated on fisheye images [9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The paper builds upon CAM-Convs and generalizes to arbitrary camera geometries, including fisheye cameras.

    “We build upon this work and generalize to arbitrary camera geometries, including fisheye cameras.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Training with the camera geometry tensor makes the network camera-independent and better generalizes to images taken from a different camera.

    “The aforementioned training strategy makes the network camera-independent and better generalizes to images taken from a different camera.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mao et al. illustrated that multi-task learning improves adversarial robustness, which is critical for safety applications.

    “Mao et al. [4] illustrated that multi-task learning improves adversarial robustness, which is critical for safety applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The discriminative features loss and the L_cvt loss help gradient descent approaches transit smoothly towards optimal solutions.

    “These losses help the gradient descent approaches to transit smoothly towards optimal solutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A single model for these four cameras instead of four individual models would have practical advantages including improved efficiency on the embedded system, improved training by access to a larger dataset and regularization through different views, and maintenance and certification of one model instead of four.

    “A single model for these four cameras instead of four individual models would also have several practical advantages such as (1) an improved efficiency on the embedded system requiring less memory and data rate to transmit, (2) an improved training by access to a larger dataset and regularization through different views, and (3) maintenance and certification of one model instead of four.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Pixel-adaptive convolutions break up the spatial invariance of convolutions and allow incorporation of location-specific semantic knowledge into multi-level distance features.

    “This, in particular, breaks up the spatial invariance of the convolutions and allows the incorporation of location-specific semantic knowledge into the multi-level distance features.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CAM-Convs uses camera-aware convolutions for pinhole cameras.

    “The closest work is CAM-Convs [30], which uses camera-aware convolutions for pinhole cameras.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The multi-task model has a shared encoder providing a significant computational advantage and has synergized decoders where tasks support each other.

    “Our multi-task model has a shared encoder providing a significant computational advantage and has synergized decoders where tasks support each other.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MultiNet was one of the first to demonstrate a three-task network on KITTI, and further works have primarily worked on a three-task setting.

    “In the automotive multi-task setting, MultiNet [5] was one of the first to demonstrate a three task network on KITTI, and further works have primarily worked on a three task setting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Multi-task learning is an efficient design pattern commonly used where most of the computation is shared across all tasks.

    “Multi-task learning (MTL) is an efficient design pattern commonly used where most of the computation is shared across all the tasks [2], [3].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] source
    • cites [3]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Variance normalization re-scales the dispersion between different task loss distributions based on the previous n epochs; a large dispersion leads to a lower task weight, and a small dispersion to a higher one, tending to homogenize the learning speed of tasks.

    “Variance normalization re-scales the dispersion between the different task loss distributions based on the previous n epochs.A large dispersion leads to a lower task weight, whereas a small dispersion to a higher one.Its final effect tends to homogenize the learning speed of tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Appearance variations of objects are larger due to spatially variant distortion, particularly for close-by objects.

    “Appearance variations of objects are larger due to the spatially variant distortion, particularly for close-by objects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fisheye perception is relatively less explored despite its prevalence.

    “Thus fisheye perception is a challenging task, however it is relatively less explored despite its prevalence.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Learning features for multiple tasks can act as a regularizer, improving generalization.

    “Furthermore, learning features for multiple tasks can act as a regularizer, improving generalization.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Semantic tasks typically require a large annotated dataset covering various objects, and it is infeasible to practically cover every possible object.

    “The semantic tasks typically require a large annotated dataset covering various objects.It is infeasible to practically cover every possible object.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The visual odometry task is required to place the detected objects in a temporally consistent map.

    “Finally, the visual odometry task is required to place the detected objects in a temporally consistent map.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fisheye images have considerably larger homogeneous areas than their rectilinear counterpart.

    “as fisheye images have considerably larger homogeneous areas than their rectilinear counterpart.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Although the underlying camera intrinsics model is the same for a particular family of vehicles, manufacturing variations require calibration of each camera instance.

    “Although the underlying camera intrinsics model is the same for a particular family of vehicles, there are variations due to manufacturing processes, which require the calibration of each camera instance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Calibration can vary after deployment due to high environmental temperature or aging.

    “Even after deployment, calibration can vary due to high environmental temperature or due to aging.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Public datasets have a single camera instance for both the training and test dataset.

    “This contrasts with public datasets, which have a single camera instance for both the training and test dataset.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Dynamic objects violate the static world assumption.

    “As dynamic objects violate the static world assumption, information about their depth/distance is essential in autonomous driving; else, we would encounter the infinite depth issue during the inference stage and incur contamination to the reconstruction losses.”
10 of 10

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Equal weighting is not worst on every reported measure

    Minor

    Table III reports a lower (better) squared relative error for equal weighting (0.058) than for geometric weighting (0.061), contradicting the unqualified statement that equal weighting is the worst.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

19 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. geiger, 0, Proc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit, 3354

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravi Kumar, V., Yogamani, S., Rashed, H., Sitsu, G., Witt, C., Leang, I., Milz, S., & Mader, P.
Affiliations
  • Valeo (Ireland) (IE)
  • Valeo (Germany) (DE)
  • Valeo (France) (FR)
  • Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2021-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
2830-2837
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W3129414859
Cited by
117
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
surround-view cameras, fisheye images, multi-task learning, autonomous driving, depth estimation, visual odometry, semantic segmentation, motion segmentation, object detection, shared encoder, KITTI, cityscape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review