Adaptive Sensor Fault Detection and Isolation using Unscented Kalman Filter for Vehicle Positioning
Abstract
There is an increasing demand for sub-meter vehicle localization for advanced safety and autonomous systems. Fault detection and isolation (FDI) for sensor systems, such as camera, LIDAR, GNSS, and V2X has been a challenge because their performances are significantly affected by weather, geographical changes, and even spoofing. In this paper, a sensor FDI using Student's t-distribution based adaptive unscented Kalman filter is presented. The proposed filter evaluate each sensor by Hotelling's T2test utilizing the predicted sensor output and its covariance. This method can assess the correlation between data that is generated within the same sensor, for accurate fault detection. In addition, measurement noise is adaptively updated by identifying both the covariance and the degree of freedom of the outlier robust Student's t-distribution. The robustness and accuracy of the localization and measurement noise estimation is confirmed through simulation and an experiment on a highway scenario. Furthermore, the result also shows that the precise FDI can be achieved without any prior information regarding sensor measurement noise. The proposed algorithm enhances the reliability of future position based systems such as autonomous control or V2V safety brake.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mori et al. presented a Kalman filter-based FDI for various sensors, including camera sensors.
“Mori et al. [21] presented a Kalman filter-based FDI for various sensors, including camera sensors.”
From Sensor-Based Prognostic Health Management of Advanced Driver Assistance System for Autonomous Vehicles: A Recent Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
The presence of Gaussian noise complicates fault diagnosis.
“However, the presence of Gaussian noise complicates fault diagnosis [21].”
From Sensor-Based Prognostic Health Management of Advanced Driver Assistance System for Autonomous Vehicles: A Recent Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Mori, D., Sugiura, H., & Hattori, Y.
- Affiliations
- Toyota Central Research and Development Laboratories (Japan) (JP)
- ORCID
- Hattori, Yoshikazu
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-10
- Pages
- 1298-1304
- OpenAlex
- W2990818895
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
- Keywords
- sensor fault detection and isolation, unscented Kalman filter, t-distribution, Hotelling's T2 test, vehicle localization, GNSS spoofing, autonomous vehicles, vehicle-to-everything communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review