Cited by 11Vehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsReinforcement Learning in RoboticsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Residual Policy Learning for Vehicle Control of Autonomous Racing Cars

Open access
Trumpp, Raphael, Hoornaert, Denis, Caccamo, Marco·2023·2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)

Abstract

The development of vehicle controllers for autonomous racing is challenging because racing cars operate at their physical driving limit. Prompted by the demand for improved performance, autonomous racing research has seen the proliferation of machine learning-based controllers. While these approaches show competitive performance, their practical applicability is often limited. Residual policy learning promises to mitigate this drawback by combining classical controllers with learned residual controllers. The critical advantage of residual controllers is their high adaptability parallel to the classical controller’s stable behavior. We propose a residual vehicle controller for autonomous racing cars that learns to amend a classical controller for the path-following of racing lines. In an extensive study, performance gains of our approach are evaluated for a simulated car of the F1TENTH autonomous racing series. The evaluation for twelve replicated real-world racetracks shows that the residual controller reduces lap times by an average of 4.55 % compared to a classical controller and even enables lap time gains on unknown racetracks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iv55152.2023.10186744

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Residual RL was deployed on the F1TENTH simulator, attaining lap time improvement and overtaking behavior on different tracks.

    “This technique was further deployed on the F1TENTH simulator [11], [12], attaining lap time improvement and overtaking behavior on different tracks.”

    From RLPP: A Residual Method for Zero-Shot Real-World Autonomous Racing on Scaled Platforms (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the residual controller was tested in the F1TENTH-gym simulator on twelve racetracks, and the Lap Times section reports improvements on both training and test tracks. The paper does not report overtaking behavior; its evaluation concerns lap times and vehicle control, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. coulter, 1992, Implementation of the pure pursuit path tracking algorithm, CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIV PITTSBURGH PA ROBOTICS INST Tech Rep
  2. 10.1109/OJITS.2022.3181510 · DOI
  3. heilmeier, 2019, Minimum curvature trajectory planning and control for an autonomous race car, Vehicle System Dynamics
  4. 10.1109/IVS.2017.7995802 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1109/LRA.2021.3064284 · DOI
  6. o’kelly, 2020, F1tenth: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and reinforcement learning, NeurIPS 2019 Competition and Demonstration Track, 77
  7. huang, 2022, Cleanrl: High-quality single-file implementations of deep reinforcement learning algorithms, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23, 1
  8. 10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811650 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/LRA.2022.3192770 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341021 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TRO.2020.2988642 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794127 · DOI · Paper page
  13. hynes, 2020, Optimising PID control with residual policy reinforcement learning, Proceedings of The 28th Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Dublin Republic of Ireland December 7-8 2020 ser CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2771, 277
  14. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.270 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Trumpp, R., Hoornaert, D., & Caccamo, M.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Venue
2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06-04
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1931-0587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385322538
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
autonomous racing car, vehicle control, path following, F1TENTH

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review