Sample expansion-oriented LDBN heart disease risk forecast model
Abstract
The risk forecast model of heart disease provides an important method for predicting the incidence of heart disease. This paper proposes a sample expansion-oriented LDBN heart disease risk forecast model, in order to solve the following problems: the difficulty of related medical data acquisition in heart disease diagnosis, less samples, the slow convergence speeds and easily caught in the local optimum of existing risk forecast models. Starting from LSTM (Long Short Term Memory) that forecast the information of the next moment with extract knowledge from existing information and combined with the current moment input information or the previous layer output information of DNN (Deep Neural Networks), the model simulates the information of patients with heart disease and adopts the corresponding strategies to expand medical data about heart disease. Then, we build a risk forecast model based on LDBN (Long Deep Belief Networks) for more accurate prediction combing with DBN (Deep Belief Network) and the improved recurrent neural Network (Long Short Term Memory) and use Heart Disease Databases of UCI to verify the accuracy of the model. Comparing with BP and DBN model, the accuracy of the proposed model is respectively increased by 2.9.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The regular learning process in ANFIS is dependent on gradient-based learning and has a tendency to become trapped in local minima.
“Furthermore, the regular learning process in ANFIS is dependent on gradient-based learning which has a tendency to become trapped in local minima [14].”
From A healthcare monitoring system for the diagnosis of heart disease in the IoMT cloud environment using MSSO-ANFIS (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Academic circles usually use contrast Divergence (Contrastive Divergence, CD) algorithm to estimate the logarithm likelihood function approximation of the unknown parameters and the CD algorithm usually can get ideal approximation by only once Gibbs sampling, that is, the step 1 CD algorithm [11]”
MethodRapid health transition in China, 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Yang, G., Wang, Y., Zeng, Y., Gao, G. F., Liang, X., Zhou, M., Wan, X., Yu, S., Jiang, Y., Naghavi, M., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61097-1 · Cited by 1,984 · see citing works
DEEPre: sequence-based enzyme EC number prediction by deep learning
Li, Y., Wang, S., Umarov, R. K., Xie, B., Fan, M., Li, L., & Gao, X. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx680 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry
Behrmann, J., Etmann, C., Boskamp, T., Casadonte, R., Kriegsmann, J., & Maaß, P. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx724 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Deep learning for classification of normal swallows in adults
Dudik, J. M., Coyle, J. L., El-Jaroudi, A., Mao, Z., Sun, M., & Sejdić, E. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.12.059 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Relative Risk and Odds Ratio Regression
Prentice, R. L., & Farewell, V. T. (1986) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.07.050186.000343 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An IoT Framework for Heart Disease Prediction Based on MDCNN Classifier
Khan, M. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2974687 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Khan, M. A., & Algarni, F. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3006424 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Chole, V., Thawakar, M., Choudhari, M. D., Chahande, S. S., Verma, S., & Pimpalkar, A. P. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106470 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Development of Medical IOT System for the Prediction of Heart Disease
Kumar, V., Saini, D., Rastogi, S., Raman, R., Verma, A., & Meenakshi, R. (2024) · International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) · doi:10.1109/icacite60783.2024.10617362 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
(2023) · International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science · doi:10.56726/irjmets41797 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease using Artificial Neural Network
Sujini, G. N. (2021) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2021.35498 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Analysis of Various Smart Healthcare Systems for Heart Disease Prediction
Arora, R. K., Gupta, M. K., & Singh, S. P. (2024) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-5231-7_32
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Chen, J., Zheng, Z., & Wang, J.
- Affiliations
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Venue
- 2018 14th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-06
- Pages
- 1327-1332
- OpenAlex
- W2889179825
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- heart disease risk prediction, long short-term memory, deep belief network, sample expansion, medical data acquisition, small sample learning, recurrent neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review