Cited by 120Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging and AnalysisArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Automatic Fetal Head Circumference Measurement in Ultrasound Using Random Forest and Fast Ellipse Fitting

Li, Jing, Wang, Yi, Lei, Baiying, Cheng, Jie-Zhi, Qin, Jing, Wang, Tianfu, Li, Shengli, Ni, Dong·2018·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Head circumference (HC) is one of the most important biometrics in assessing fetal growth during prenatal ultrasound examinations. However, the manual measurement of this biometric by doctors often requires substantial experience. We developed a learning-based framework that used prior knowledge and employed a fast ellipse fitting method (ElliFit) to measure HC automatically. We first integrated the prior knowledge about the gestational age and ultrasound scanning depth into a random forest classifier to localize the fetal head. We further used phase symmetry to detect the center line of the fetal skull and employed ElliFit to fit the HC ellipse for measurement. The experimental results from 145 HC images showed that our method had an average measurement error of 1.7 mm and outperformed traditional methods. The experimental results demonstrated that our method shows great promise for applications in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2017.2703890

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 120

Authors
Li, J., Wang, Y., Lei, B., Cheng, J.-Z., Qin, J., Wang, T., Li, S., & Ni, D.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2018-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
215-223
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2613049942
Cited by
120
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61571304, 81571758, 61501305)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2016YFC0104703)
  • Shenzhen Basic Research Project (JCYJ20150525092940982, JCYJ20150525092940986, JCYJ20150525092940988)
  • Shenzhen Peacock Plan (KQTD2016053112051497)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
fetal head circumference, fetal biometry, prenatal ultrasound, automated measurement, random forest classification, ellipse fitting, phase symmetry, gestational age, fetal growth assessment
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Cephalometry, Decision Trees, Female, Fetus, Head, Humans, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review