Cited by 29Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareNeural Networks and Applications

Optimizing Autoencoders for Learning Deep Representations from Health Data

Zhou, Chongyu, Jia, Yao, Motani, Mehul·2019·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Analyzing patients' health data using machine learning techniques can improve both patient outcomes and hospital operations. However, heterogeneous patient data (e.g., vital signs) and inefficient feature learning methods affect the implementation of machine learning-based patient data analysis. In this paper, we present a novel unsupervised deep learning-based feature learning (DFL) framework to automatically learn compact representations from patient health data for efficient clinical decision making. Real-world pneumonia patient data from the National University Hospital in Singapore are collected and analyzed to evaluate the performance of DFL. Furthermore, publicly available electroencephalogram data are extracted from the UCI Machine Learning Repository to test and support our findings. Using both data sets, we compare the performance of DFL to that of several popular feature learning methods and demonstrate its advantages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2018.2856820

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For outcomes that happen in hospital, such as inpatient mortality, length-of-stay, and intervention prediction, observation windows at hour level are developed.

    “On the contrary, for those outcomes that happen in hospital, such as inpatient mortality [14,57,61,65], length-of-stay [14,83], and intervention prediction [32,55,65], observation windows at hour level are developed.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, C., Jia, Y., & Motani, M.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2019-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
103-111
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2883672015
Cited by
29
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education - Singapore (R-263-000-C81-114)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
autoencoder, deep feature learning, unsupervised feature learning, patient health data, clinical decision support, pneumonia, EEG, vital signs, data heterogeneity, compact representation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Electroencephalography, Humans, Medical Informatics, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review