Cited by 27Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Multi-Parametric Fusion of 3D Power Doppler Ultrasound for Fetal Kidney Segmentation Using Fully Convolutional Neural Networks

Open access
Weerasinghe, Nipuna H., Lovell, Nigel H., Welsh, Alec W., Stevenson, Gordon N.·2021·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Kidney development is key to the long-term health of the fetus. Renal volume and vascularity assessed by 3D ultrasound (3D-US) are known markers of wellbeing, however, a lack of real-time image segmentation solutions preclude these measures being used in a busy clinical environment. In this work, we aimed to automate kidney segmentation using fully convolutional neural networks (fCNNs). We used multi-parametric input fusion incorporating 3D B-Mode and power Doppler (PD) volumes, aiming to improve segmentation accuracy. Three different fusion strategies and their performance were assessed versus a single input (B-Mode) network. Early input-level fusion provided the best segmentation accuracy with an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.81 and Hausdorff distance (HD) of 8.96 mm, an improvement of 0.06 DSC and reduction of 1.43 mm HD compared to our baseline network. Compared to manual segmentation for all models, repeatability was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) indicating good to excellent reproducibility (ICC 0.93). The framework was extended to support multiple graphics processing units (GPUs) to better handle volumetric data, dense fCNN models, batch normalization and complex fusion networks. This work and available source code provides a framework to increase the parameter space of encoder-decoder style fCNNs across multiple GPUs and shows that application of multi-parametric 3D-US in fCNN training improves segmentation accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2020.3027318

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies focused on amniotic fluid, with one evaluating automatic measurement of amniotic fluid index and the other assessing segmentation of amniotic fluid and fetal tissue.

    “Two studies focused on amniotic fluid with one evaluating automatic measurement of amniotic fluid index 120 and the other assessing segmentation of amniotic fluid and fetal tissue.121”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weerasinghe, N. H., Lovell, N. H., Welsh, A. W., & Stevenson, G. N.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2021-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
2050-2057
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W3090745929
Cited by
27
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Leslie Stevens Fund for Newborn Care, Sydney, Australia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
3D power Doppler ultrasound, fully convolutional network, renal volume, B-mode ultrasound, encoder-decoder architecture, intra-class correlation
MeSH terms
Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Kidney, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Ultrasonography, Doppler

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review