Cited by 71Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Guest Editorial Explainable AI: Towards Fairness, Accountability, Transparency and Trust in Healthcare

Open access
Shaban-Nejad, Arash, Michalowski, Martin, Brownstein, John, Buckeridge, David·2021·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

The papers in this special section focus on explainable artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare services. Recent advances in AI, precision health, and medicine have paved the way for the accelerated adaptation and use of intelligent tools and systems in decision-making processes across the healthcare spectrum. Insights and knowledge derived from complex analytics are used to implement diagnostic and therapeutic solutions and targeted interventions in individuals and communities across the globe. Given the complexity of the current multi-dimensional clinical and public health data landscape, providing explainability in the context of socio-environmental and technical systems is a key to revealing pathways from socio-economic disadvantages to health disparities and implementing equitable interventions. As the complexity of the underlying data sets and AI-based algorithms increases, the explainability and justifiability of the insights generated decrease. Humans need to understand the underlying mechanism behind these insights to know whether they are sound, correct, trustable, and justifiable to make informed decisions. Lack of understandability and explainability in the biomedical domain often leads to poor transparency and accountability and ultimately lower quality of care and suboptimal and unfair health policies. Explainability is considered one of the prerequisites for deep medicine, where AI is meant to provide composite, panoramic views of individuals’ medical data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2021.3088832

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The integration of AI into healthcare alters traditional decision-making practices based on epistemic probability and prudence and raises ethical, legal, and medical dilemmas when making critical decisions about human lives and medical conditions.

    “Additionally, the integration of AI into healthcare alters traditional decision-making practices based on epistemic probability and prudence (Parviainen, Rantala (2022)) and raises ethical, legal, and medical dilemmas when it comes to making critical decisions about human lives and medical conditions (Shaban-Nejad et al., 2021;Vilaza & McCashin, 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. W. Shi, L. Tong, Y. Zhu, and M. D. Wang, "COVID- 19 automatic diagnosis with radiographic imaging: Ex- plainable attentiontransfer deep neural networks," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  2. Y. Jeon et al., "Interpretable and lightweight 3-D deep learning model for automated ACL diagnosis," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  3. P. Ivaturi, M. Gadaleta, A. C. Pandey, M. Pazzani, S. R. Steinhubl, and G. Quer, "A comprehensive explanation framework for biomedical time series classification," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  4. N. Beebe-Wang, A. Okeson, T. Althoff, and S. I. Lee, "Efficient and explainable risk assessments for immi- nent dementia in an aging cohort study," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  5. L. Alexandre, R. S. Costa, L. L. Santos, and R. Hen- riques, "Mining pre-surgical patterns able to discrimi- nate post-surgical outcomes in the oncological domain," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  6. K. K. Wickstrom, K. OyvindMikalsen, M. Kampffmeyer, A. Revhaug, and R. Jenssen, "Uncertainty-Aware deep ensembles for reliable and explainable predictions of clinical time series," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  7. H. Xu, J. Pang, W. Zhang, X. Li, M. Li, and D. Zhao, "Predicting recurrence for patients with ischemic cere- brovascular events based on process discovery and trans- fer learning," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  8. A. Chaddad, P. Sargos, and C. Desrosiers, "Modeling texture in deep 3D CNN for survival analysis," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  9. Y. Shang et al., "EHR-oriented knowledge graph sys- tem: Toward efficient utilization of Non-used informa- tion buried in routine clinical practice," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  10. W. Oh, M. S. Steinbach, M. R. Castro, K. A. Peterson, and V. Kumar, "A computational method for learning disease trajectories from partially observable EHR data," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
  11. G. Feng, K. Yu, Y. Wang, Y. Yuan, and P. M. Djuric, "Exploiting causality for improved prediction of pa- tient volumes by Gaussian processes," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, no. 7, Jul. 2021. REFERENCES
  12. A. Holzinger, G. Langs, H. Denk, K. Zatloukal, and H. Müller, "Caus- ability and explain-ability of artificial intelligence in medicine," Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 9, no. 4, Jul./Aug. 2019, Art. no. e1312.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., Brownstein, J., & Buckeridge, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2021-07
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
2374-2375
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W3185885987
Cited by
71
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
explainable AI, artificial intelligence in healthcare, fairness, accountability, transparency, trust, health disparities, clinical decision support, precision health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review