Cited by 32Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

A Pseudo-Siamese Feature Fusion Generative Adversarial Network for Synthesizing High-Quality Fetal Four-Chamber Views

Qiao, Sibo, Pan, Silin, Luo, Gang, Pang, Shanchen, Chen, Taotao, Singh, Amit Kumar, Lv, Zhihan·2023·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Four-chamber (FC) views are the primary ultrasound(US) images that cardiologists diagnose whether the fetus has congenital heart disease (CHD) in prenatal diagnosis and screening. FC views intuitively depict the developmental morphology of the fetal heart. Early diagnosis of fetal CHD has always been the focus and difficulty of prenatal screening. Furthermore, deep learning technology has achieved great success in medical image analysis. Hence, applying deep learning technology in the early screening of fetal CHD helps improve diagnostic accuracy. However, the lack of large-scale and high-quality fetal FC views brings incredible difficulties to deep learning models or cardiologists. Hence, we propose a Pseudo-Siamese Feature Fusion Generative Adversarial Network (PSFFGAN), synthesizing high-quality fetal FC views using FC sketch images. In addition, we propose a novel Triplet Generative Adversarial Loss Function (TGALF), which optimizes PSFFGAN to fully extract the cardiac anatomical structure information provided by FC sketch images to synthesize the corresponding fetal FC views with speckle noises, artifacts, and other ultrasonic characteristics. The experimental results show that the fetal FC views synthesized by our proposed PSFFGAN have the best objective evaluation values: SSIM of 0.4627, MS-SSIM of 0.6224, and FID of 83.92, respectively. More importantly, two professional cardiologists evaluate healthy FC views and CHD FC views synthesized by our PSFFGAN, giving a subjective score that the average qualified rate is 82% and 79%, respectively, which further proves the effectiveness of the PSFFGAN.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3143319

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 32

Authors
Qiao, S., Pan, S., Luo, G., Pang, S., Chen, T., Singh, A. K., & Lv, Z.
Affiliations
  • China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
  • Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital (CN)
  • National Institute of Technology Patna (IN)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2023-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
1193-1204
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4205341905
Cited by
32
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61873281)
  • Major Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Province (2019TSLH0214)
  • Tai Shan Industry Leading Talent Project (tscy20180416)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
congenital heart disease, prenatal ultrasound, medical image synthesis, generative adversarial networks, sketch-to-image synthesis, prenatal screening, speckle noise, ultrasound artifacts
MeSH terms
Echocardiography, Female, Fetal Heart, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review