Cited by 105Advanced DC-DC ConvertersWireless Power Transfer SystemsMultilevel Inverters and Converters

Comprehensive Conceptualization, Design, and Experimental Verification of a Weight-Optimized All-SiC 2 kV/700 V DAB for an Airborne Wind Turbine

Gammeter, Christoph, Krismer, Florian, Kolar, Johann W.·2016·IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics

Abstract

This paper details the design, implementation, and experimental verification of a minimum weight input series output parallel structured dual active bridge (DAB) converter for an airborne wind turbine system. The main power components of the DAB converter, particularly the bridge circuits, the actively cooled high-frequency transformer and inductor, and the cooling system, which largely contribute to the total system weight, are designed and realized based on multiobjective considerations, i.e., with respect to weight and efficiency. Furthermore, the design includes all necessary considerations to realize a fully functional prototype, i.e., it also considers the auxiliary supply, the control for a stable operation of the system, which also comprises an input filter, over the specified operating range, and the start-up and shut down procedures. These considerations show the complex interactions of the various system parts and reveal that a comprehensive conceptualization is necessary to arrive at a reliable minimum weight design. Experimental results validate the proposed design procedure for a realized lightweight DAB hardware prototype with a rated power of 6.25 kW. The prototype weighs 1.46 kg, i.e., features a power-to-weight ratio of 4.28 kW/kg (1.94 kW/lb), and achieves a maximum full-load efficiency of 97.5%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jestpe.2015.2459378

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gammeter, C., Krismer, F., & Kolar, J. W.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics
Published
2016-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
638-656
ISSN
  • 2168-6777 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6785
OpenAlex
W2346954480
Cited by
105
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Keywords
dual active bridge converter, weight optimization, high-frequency transformer, multi-objective design, specific power, converter efficiency, input filter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review