The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Workload Allocation in Fog-Cloud Computing Towards Balanced Delay and Power Consumption
Abstract
Mobile users typically have high demand on localized and location-based information services. To always retrieve the localized data from the remote cloud, however, tends to be inefficient, which motivates fog computing. The fog computing, also known as edge computing, extends cloud computing by deploying localized computing facilities at the premise of users, which prestores cloud data and distributes to mobile users with fast-rate local connections. As such, fog computing introduces an intermediate fog layer between mobile users and cloud, and complements cloud computing toward low-latency high-rate services to mobile users. In this fundamental framework, it is important to study the interplay and cooperation between the edge (fog) and the core (cloud). In this paper, the tradeoff between power consumption and transmission delay in the fog-cloud computing system is investigated. We formulate a workload allocation problem which suggests the optimal workload allocations between fog and cloud toward the minimal power consumption with the constrained service delay. The problem is then tackled using an approximate approach by decomposing the primal problem into three subproblems of corresponding subsystems, which can be, respectively, solved. Finally, based on simulations and numerical results, we show that by sacrificing modest computation resources to save communication bandwidth and reduce transmission latency, fog computing can significantly improve the performance of cloud computing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
The Hungarian method for the assignment problem
Kuhn, H. W. (1955) · Naval Research Logistics Quarterly · doi:10.1002/nav.3800020109 · Cited by 13,120
Fog Computing: A Platform for Internet of Things and Analytics
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Natarajan, P., & Zhu, J. (2014) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05029-4_7 · Cited by 1,222
The Fog Computing Paradigm: Scenarios and Security Issues
Stojmenovic, I., & Wen, S. (2014) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2014f503 · Cited by 1,037
Fog computing architecture to enable consumer centric internet of things services
Datta, S. K., Bonnet, C., & Haerri, J. (2015) · 2015 International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE) · doi:10.1109/isce.2015.7177778 · Cited by 172
Cited by
All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms: A complete survey
Yousefpour, A., Fung, C., Nguyen, T., Kadiyala, K., Jalali, F., Niakanlahiji, A., Kong, J., & Jue, J. P. (2019) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.02.009 · Cited by 1,368
Edge Computing in Industrial Internet of Things: Architecture, Advances and Challenges
Qiu, T., Chi, J., Zhou, X., Ning, Z., Atiquzzaman, M., & Wu, D. O. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3009103 · Cited by 857
Collaborative Cloud and Edge Computing for Latency Minimization
Ren, J., Yu, G., He, Y., & Li, G. Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2904244 · Cited by 685
Dynamic Task Offloading and Resource Allocation for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Edge Computing
Liu, C.-F., Bennis, M., Debbah, M., & Poor, H. V. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2019.2898573 · Cited by 435
Resource management approaches in fog computing: a comprehensive review
Ghobaei-Arani, M., Souri, A., & Rahmanian, A. A. (2020) · Journal of Grid Computing · doi:10.1007/s10723-019-09491-1 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, R., Lu, R., Lai, C., Luan, T. H., & Liang, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2394115245
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 90.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Workload Allocation in Fog-Cloud Computing Towards Balanced Delay and Power Consumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2016.2565516
- The paper
- Deng, R., Lu, R., Lai, C., Luan, T. H., & Liang, H. (2016). Optimal Workload Allocation in Fog-Cloud Computing Towards Balanced Delay and Power Consumption. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2016.2565516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.