Cited by 60Advanced Authentication Protocols SecuritySecurity in Wireless Sensor NetworksCryptography and Data Security

GroupIt: Lightweight group key management for dynamic iot environments

Kung, Yi-Hsuan, Hsiao, Hsu-Chun·2018·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

With the proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices that collect sensitive data, access control is more crucial than ever to safeguard IoT data from unauthorized use. To enforce access control policies without trusted online entity, one promising approach is to maintain a group key shared between a device and its current subscribers, such that the device can encrypt its data and only the subscribers can decrypt it. However, prior group key management (GKM) schemes fail to efficiently address new challenges introduced by the massive scale of IoT devices, dynamic memberships of users, and changes in the number of devices. This paper explores efficient GKM to accommodate multiple devices (in addition to multiple users) and to handle frequent membership and device number changes. Inspired by the observation that devices with similar functionalities often have similar access permissions, we propose a two-tier GKM architecture called GroupIt, in which each device is assigned to one of many predefined groups, and key management is performed within each group as well as between groups to improve efficiency. Despite being conceptually simple, GroupIt addresses technical challenges including: 1) preventing a malicious device from obtaining extra information about other devices in the same group and 2) ensuring forward/backward secrecy and preventing collusion attacks when gluing two existing GKMs together. The probability of a successful collusion attack quickly drops to 0.3% after five membership changes even in a small device group (e.g., 8). This paper provides both theoretical analysis and a proof-of-concept implementation based on Alljoyn, an opensource IoT communication framework to demonstrate the feasibility of GroupIt.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2018.2840321

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 60

Authors
Kung, Y.-H., & Hsiao, H.-C.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University (TW)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2018-12
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
5155-5165
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W2804024218
Cited by
60
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Academia Sinica
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 106-3114-E-011-003, 107-2636-E-002-005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
group key management, Internet of Things, access control, dynamic group membership, collusion attacks, forward and backward secrecy, lightweight cryptography, Internet of Things security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review