Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low-Power Wide Area Network Technologies for Internet-of-Things: A Comparative Review

Open access
Ikpehai, Augustine, Adebisi, Bamidele, Rabie, Khaled M., Anoh, Kelvin, Ande, Ruth E., Hammoudeh, Mohammad, Gacanin, Haris, Mbanaso, Uche M.·2019·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The rapid growth of Internet-of-Things (IoT) in the current decade has led to the development of a multitude of new access technologies targeted at low-power, wide area networks (LP-WANs). However, this has also created another challenge pertaining to technology selection. This paper reviews the performance of LP-WAN technologies for IoT, including design choices and their implications. We consider Sigfox, LoRaWAN, WavIoT, random phase multiple access (RPMA), narrowband IoT (NB-IoT), as well as LTE-M and assess their performance in terms of signal propagation, coverage and energy conservation. The comparative analyses presented in this paper are based on available data sheets and simulation results. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted to evaluate network performance in response to variations in system design parameters. Results show that each of RPMA, NB-IoT, and LTE-M incurs at least 9 dB additional path loss relative to Sigfox and LoRaWAN. This paper further reveals that with a 10% improvement in receiver sensitivity, NB-IoT 882 MHz and LoRaWAN can increase coverage by up to 398% and 142%, respectively, without adverse effects on the energy requirements. Finally, extreme weather conditions can significantly reduce the active network life of LP-WANs. In particular, the results indicate that operating an IoT device in a temperature of -20 °C can shorten its life by about half; 53% (WavIoT, LoRaWAN, Sigfox, NB-IoT, and RPMA) and 48% in LTE-M compared with environmental temperature of 40 °C.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2018.2883728

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Ikpehai, A., Adebisi, B., Rabie, K. M., Anoh, K., Ande, R. E., Hammoudeh, M., Gacanin, H., & Mbanaso, U. M.
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2019-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
2225-2240
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W2903076712
Cited by
320
References
38
FWCI
13.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-Power Wide Area Network Technologies for Internet-of-Things: A Comparative Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2018.2883728
The paper
Ikpehai, A., Adebisi, B., Rabie, K. M., Anoh, K., Ande, R. E., Hammoudeh, M., Gacanin, H., & Mbanaso, U. M. (2019). Low-Power Wide Area Network Technologies for Internet-of-Things: A Comparative Review. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2018.2883728

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.