Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local Differential Privacy for Deep Learning

Open access
Mahawaga Arachchige, Pathum Chamikara, Bertok, Peter, Khalil, Ibrahim, Liu, Dongxi, Camtepe, Seyit, Atiquzzaman, Mohammed·2020·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is transforming major industries, including but not limited to healthcare, agriculture, finance, energy, and transportation. IoT platforms are continually improving with innovations, such as the amalgamation of software-defined networks (SDNs) and network function virtualization (NFV) in the edge-cloud interplay. Deep learning (DL) is becoming popular due to its remarkable accuracy when trained with a massive amount of data such as generated by IoT. However, DL algorithms tend to leak privacy when trained on highly sensitive crowd-sourced data such as medical data. The existing privacy-preserving DL algorithms rely on the traditional server-centric approaches requiring high processing powers. We propose a new local differentially private (LDP) algorithm named LATENT that redesigns the training process. LATENT enables a data owner to add a randomization layer before data leave the data owners' devices and reach a potentially untrusted machine learning service. This feature is achieved by splitting the architecture of a convolutional neural network (CNN) into three layers: 1) convolutional module (CNM); 2) randomization module; and 3) fully connected module. Hence, the randomization module can operate as an NFV privacy preservation service in an SDN-controlled NFV, making LATENT more practical for IoT-driven cloud-based environments compared to existing approaches. The randomization module employs a newly proposed LDP protocol named utility enhancing randomization, which allows LATENT to maintain high utility compared to existing LDP protocols. Our experimental evaluation of LATENT on convolutional deep neural networks demonstrates excellent accuracy (e.g., 91%-96%) with high model quality even under low privacy budgets (e.g., ε = 0.5).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2019.2952146

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Mahawaga Arachchige, P. C., Bertok, P., Khalil, I., Liu, D., Camtepe, S., & Atiquzzaman, M.
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2020-07
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
5827-5842
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W2964881778
Cited by
248
References
6
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Differential Privacy for Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2019.2952146
The paper
Mahawaga Arachchige, P. C., Bertok, P., Khalil, I., Liu, D., Camtepe, S., & Atiquzzaman, M. (2020). Local Differential Privacy for Deep Learning. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2019.2952146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.