Cited by 136Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingGait Recognition and Analysis

ST-DeepHAR: Deep Learning Model for Human Activity Recognition in IoHT Applications

Abdel-Basset, Mohamed, Hawash, Hossam, Chakrabortty, Ripon K., Ryan, Michael, Elhoseny, Mohamed, Song, Houbing·2021·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) has been regarded as an indispensable part of many smart home systems and smart healthcare applications. Specifically, HAR is of great importance in the Internet of Healthcare Things (IoHT), owing to the rapid proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies embedded in various smart appliances and wearable devices (such as smartphones and smartwatches) that have a pervasive impact on an individual's life. The inertial sensors of smartphones generate massive amounts of multidimensional time-series data, which can be exploited effectively for HAR purposes. Unlike traditional approaches, deep learning techniques are the most suitable choice for such multivariate streams. In this study, we introduce a supervised dual-channel model that comprises long short-term memory (LSTM), followed by an attention mechanism for the temporal fusion of inertial sensor data concurrent with a convolutional residual network for the spatial fusion of sensor data. We also introduce an adaptive channel-squeezing operation to fine-tune convolutional a neural network feature extraction capability by exploiting multichannel dependency. Finally, two widely available and public HAR data sets are used in experiments to evaluate the performance of our model. The results demonstrate that our proposed approach can overcome state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2020.3033430

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdel-Basset, M., Hawash, H., Chakrabortty, R. K., Ryan, M., Elhoseny, M., & Song, H.
Affiliations
  • Zagazig University (EG)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Mansoura University (EG)
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach Florida Campus (US)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2021-03-15
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
4969-4979
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3093916778
Cited by
136
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 12
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, Internet of Medical Things, inertial data, smartphone sensors, wearable devices, LSTM, attention mechanism, home automation, smart healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review