Cited by 53Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security Solutions

Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning Based on Multiparty Secure Computation: A Survey

Zhang, Qiao, Xin, Chunsheng, Wu, Hongyi·2021·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) has demonstrated superior success in various of applications, such as image classification, speech recognition, and anomalous detection. The unprecedented performance gain of DL largely depends on tremendous training data, high-performance computation resources, and well-designed model structures. However, privacy concerns raise from such necessities. First, as the training data are usually distributed among multiple parties, directly exposing and collecting such large amount of data could violate the laws especially for private information, such as personal identities, medical records, and financial profiles. Second, locally deploying advantageous computation resources is costly for individual party having partial data. Third, direct release of well-trained model parameters threatens the information about training data or the intellectual property of model owners. Therefore, individual party prefers outsourcing computation (data) in a secure way to powerful cloud servers such as Microsoft Azure, and how to enable the cloud servers to perform DL algorithms without revealing data owners’ private information and model owners’ valuable parameters is emerging as an urgent task, which is termed as privacy-preserving (outsourcing) DL. In this article, we review the state-of-the-art researches in privacy-preserving DL based on multiparty secure computation with data encryption and summarize these techniques in both training phase and inference phase. Specifically,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3058638

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Q., Xin, C., & Wu, H.
Affiliations
Old Dominion University (US)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
13
Pages
10412-10429
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3130108574
Cited by
53
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CNS-1828593, OAC-1829771, EEC-1840458, CNS-1950704)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-20-1-2065)
  • Commonwealth Cyber Initiative, an Investment in the Advancement of Cyber Research and Development, Innovation and Workforce Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
privacy-preserving deep learning, secure multi-party computation, data privacy, data encryption, secure inference, cloud computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review