Cited by 25IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingEnergy Efficiency in ComputingCloud Computing and Resource Management

Optimized Task Allocation for IoT Application in Mobile-Edge Computing

Liu, Jialei, Liu, Chunhong, Wang, Bo, Gao, Guowei, Wang, Shangguang·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

With the rapid upgrading and explosive growth of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in mobile-edge computing, more and more IoT applications with high resource requirements are developed and utilized. Meanwhile, there are large quantities of edge nodes (e.g., switches and edge servers) with limited resources, higher operating costs, and certain failure probabilities in the mobile-edge computing environment. Therefore, when an IoT application is split into multiple collaborative tasks and offloaded into multiple edge clouds, there is an urgent need to increase the availability level of the task allocation scheme and the resource utilization of edge servers under the condition of certain communication delay. In this article, we first present a joint optimization objective to evaluate the unavailability level, communication delay, and resource wastage while allocating the same batch of IoT applications to multiple edge clouds. We then propose an approach to minimize the joint optimization objective under the condition of certain communication delay. Finally, we performed a comprehensive simulation experiment analysis to demonstrate that our proposed approach is superior to other related approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3091599

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., Liu, C., Wang, B., Gao, G., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
  • Anyang Normal University (CN)
  • Henan Normal University (CN)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2022-07-01
Volume
9
Issue
13
Pages
10370-10381
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3174690704
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1805500)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61922017, 62032003, 61921003)
  • Key Science and Technology Research Project of Henan Province (192102310212, 202102210163, 202102210152)
  • Key Science and Technology Research Project of Anyang City (2021C01GX017)
  • Research and Cultivation Fund Project of Anyang Normal University (AYNUKPY-2019-24)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
task allocation, mobile edge computing, IoT applications, task offloading, edge-cloud computing, communication delay, joint optimization, availability, resource waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review