Cited by 26Cryptography and Data SecuritySmart Grid Security and ResilienceCloud Data Security Solutions

A secure revocable fine-grained access control and data sharing scheme for SCADA in IIoT systems

Zhang, Weiting, Zhang, Hanyi, Fang, Liming, Liu, Zhe, Ge, Chunpeng·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

The supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system is widely used in industrial control and the contemporary Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). Unfortunately, due to its relatively weak design in terms of data security and access control, SCADA systems are becoming a favorite target for attackers. End-to-end encryption, such as SSL/TLS protocol, is used to protect the data transmission, but it cannot guarantee security in third-party cloud platforms. In this article, we propose a secure revocable fine-grained access control and data sharing scheme. This scheme not only ensures the confidentiality of the data but also enhances the access control of the SCADA system. Our scheme is based on three key observations. The common communication architecture of SCADA systems cannot protect data security itself. The security supports provided by industrial control protocols are limited. Moreover, the third-party cloud platforms are semitrusted. In addition, we have introduced digital signature technology to assure the integrity of the data in the SCADA system. We prove that our scheme is secure. This scheme has been experimentally evaluated to introduce negligible performance losses while improving data security in the SCADA system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3091760

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The problem of remote access to enterprise resources at the edge has been analyzed in Industrial IoT scenarios or in Industrial Control Systems architectures, often with a reduced focus on security.

    “The problem of remote access to enterprise resources at the edge has been analyzed in Industrial IoT scenarios [9] or in Industrial Control Systems architectures [10,11], often with a reduced focus on security.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 26

Authors
Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Fang, L., Liu, Z., & Ge, C.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2022-02-01
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
1976-1984
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3199210755
Cited by
26
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020AAA0107700, 2020YFB1005900)
  • National Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province (2020B0101090002)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872181, 62032025, 62076125, U20B2049, U20B2050, 61702236)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515012650)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BE2020106)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
SCADA, Industrial Internet of Things, revocable access control, fine-grained access control, data sharing, data confidentiality, data integrity, digital signatures, industrial control protocols, data security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review