A secure revocable fine-grained access control and data sharing scheme for SCADA in IIoT systems
Abstract
The supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system is widely used in industrial control and the contemporary Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). Unfortunately, due to its relatively weak design in terms of data security and access control, SCADA systems are becoming a favorite target for attackers. End-to-end encryption, such as SSL/TLS protocol, is used to protect the data transmission, but it cannot guarantee security in third-party cloud platforms. In this article, we propose a secure revocable fine-grained access control and data sharing scheme. This scheme not only ensures the confidentiality of the data but also enhances the access control of the SCADA system. Our scheme is based on three key observations. The common communication architecture of SCADA systems cannot protect data security itself. The security supports provided by industrial control protocols are limited. Moreover, the third-party cloud platforms are semitrusted. In addition, we have introduced digital signature technology to assure the integrity of the data in the SCADA system. We prove that our scheme is secure. This scheme has been experimentally evaluated to introduce negligible performance losses while improving data security in the SCADA system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The problem of remote access to enterprise resources at the edge has been analyzed in Industrial IoT scenarios or in Industrial Control Systems architectures, often with a reduced focus on security.
“The problem of remote access to enterprise resources at the edge has been analyzed in Industrial IoT scenarios [9] or in Industrial Control Systems architectures [10,11], often with a reduced focus on security.”
From A Zero-Trust Architecture for Remote Access in Industrial IoT Infrastructures (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Zhang, W., Zhang, H., Fang, L., Liu, Z., & Ge, C.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2022-02-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1976-1984
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W3199210755
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020AAA0107700, 2020YFB1005900)
- National Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province (2020B0101090002)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872181, 62032025, 62076125, U20B2049, U20B2050, 61702236)
- Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515012650)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BE2020106)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Keywords
- SCADA, Industrial Internet of Things, revocable access control, fine-grained access control, data sharing, data confidentiality, data integrity, digital signatures, industrial control protocols, data security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review