Cited by 18Access Control and TrustIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingDigital Rights Management and Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SmartABAC: Enabling Constrained IoT Devices to Make Complex Policy-Based Access Control Decisions

Open access
Fedrecheski, Geovane, De Biase, Laisa Caroline Costa, Calcina-Ccori, Pablo C., de Deus Lopes, Roseli, Zuffo, Marcelo Knörich·2022·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

While attribute-based access control (ABAC) is a promising technique to govern interactions in the Internet of Things (IoT), most existing ABAC models are designed to run on remote servers or gateway devices. This scenario is misaligned with recent trends toward IoT decentralization, such as the Swarm, which expects devices to autonomously share resources, making their own access decisions for enhanced privacy and reliability. In this article, we propose SmartABAC: a fast, concise, and expressive ABAC model that can be executed in constrained IoT devices. It combines the performance of policies based on attribute enumeration, with techniques that enhance policy expressiveness, such as typed and hierarchical attributes. We specified SmartABAC using first-order logic, designed a use case, and evaluated it in both constrained and nonconstrained IoT environments. Results show that our model can represent a variety of access policies, including nested multiattribute rules, while using less than 100 bytes per policy, on average, for a smart home use case. Our C-based SmartABAC implementation is at least 255 times faster than existing models and can evaluate 3000 policies under 5 ms on a 32-MHz MCU.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2021.3110142

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1109/TCE.2015.7389799 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2886069 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2969326 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.017 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1109/TDSC.2020.2999866 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/978-3-319-17040-4_12 · DOI
  7. Parducci, 2013, eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) Version 3.0
  8. 10.1109/WoWMoM.2013.6583465 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-3-319-41483-6_9 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/2875491.2875498 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.sysarc.2010.04.005 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s42979-019-0022-z · DOI
  13. 10.1109/IWCMC.2019.8766478 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3002709 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3033434 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2952141 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102907 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.comnet.2016.11.007 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/11426639_27 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/2.485845 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102468 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TDSC.2021.3085475 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/3041048.3041053 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2839065 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/978-3-030-58951-6_26 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/TDSC.2021.3054331 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/3180457.3180464 · DOI
  28. 10.1145/3007204 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/CAIS.2019.8769462 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/3433542 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TEM.2019.2926471 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sporny, 2019, Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0
  33. 10.1109/TII.2020.3022759 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/TCE.2018.2883382 · DOI
  35. Rabaey, The swarm at the edge of the cloud—A new perspective on wireless, 6
  36. 10.1109/GIOTS49054.2020.9119664 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.17487/rfc7228 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/CloudNet.2018.8549500 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Fedrecheski, G., De Biase, L. C. C., Calcina-Ccori, P. C., de Deus Lopes, R., & Zuffo, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • LSITEC and the Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Polytechnic School of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Laboratorio de Sistemas Integráveis, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2022-04-01
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
5040-5050
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3196685655
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social: Smart Cities Pilots (6.168.378)
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação: SBCs Nacionais para IoT (01245.010112/2020-11)
  • U.S. Office of Naval Research Global: SDR IoT Organic Sensing (N62909-17-1-2175)
  • Pró-Reitoria de Pós-Graduação da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Laboratório de Sistemas Integráveis Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Rights Management and Security
Keywords
attribute-based access control, Internet of Things, resource-constrained devices, distributed access control, swarms, first-order logic, home automation, resource sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review