The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Reputation-Based Truth Discovery With Long-Term Quality of Source in Internet of Things
Abstract
Although the Internet of Things (IoT) devices have been widely used for data collection in various applications, the observed data of an object from each IoT device (i.e., source) may vary from the ground truth due to the different qualities of IoT devices and sensing environments. Truth discovery has become a promising technology to extract the truth among multiple conflicting pieces of data from different sources. Existing methods usually assume the quality of source (source reliability) is unknown a priori and will be estimated as the weight for calculating the truth during each truth discovery task. However, in a long-term data observation scenario, the quality of source can be accumulated and utilized in the future truth discovery process. Aiming to take the long-term quality of source into consideration, in this article, we propose a reputation-based truth discovery method to derive the truth from the conflicting data. Specifically, we propose a generalized formulation with linear constraint for the truth discovery problem, which can cope with different regulations on the source reliability. Instead of directly using weight as the source reliability, we also define the reliability of a source by its contribution to the loss function. Then, we propose a novel reputation model to quantify the newly defined source reliability, which will be accumulated as the long-term source quality. Finally, we propose a reputation-based truth discovery model, where initial weights are assigned based on source reputations. Experiments conducted on real-weather conditions and GPS data sets demonstrate that our reputation-based truth discovery can reduce the number of iterations during truth discovery and achieve high accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 17
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1109/TKDE.2011.75 · DOI
- Pasternack, Knowing what to believe (when you already know something), 877
- 10.14778/1687553.1687620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TKDE.2007.190745 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2588555.2610509 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2809695.2809715 · DOI
- 10.1145/2897350.2897352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TKDE.2016.2559481 · DOI
- 10.1145/3187009.3177739 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICDM.2018.00097 · DOI
- 10.1145/2783258.2783277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/BigData.2017.8257911 · DOI
- 10.1109/TBDATA.2018.2824812 · DOI
- 10.1145/1718487.1718504 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1609/aaai.v28i2.19016 · DOI
- 10.1145/1963405.1963439 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSIPN.2019.2914610 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPDS.2016.2515092 · DOI
- 10.1109/IPSN.2012.6920960 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2016.2535383 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSC.2019.2961992 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICTAI.2019.00076 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2018.2837026 · DOI
- 10.14778/1687627.1687691 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2939672.2939816 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-981-10-3892-1_5 · DOI
- 10.1109/MDM.2010.57 · DOI
- 10.1109/TKDE.2015.2504928 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2018.2819134 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3029221 · DOI
- 10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.180 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TVT.2019.2938968 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2938968
- 10.1109/TITS.2015.2494017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2720635 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSP.2020.3013781 · DOI
- 10.1109/CompComm.2018.8780660 · doi:10.1109/compcomm.2018.8780660
- 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2951687 · DOI
- 10.1109/INFOCOM.2017.8057114 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, L., Yang, K., & Yang, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2022-04-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 5410-5421
- ISSN
- 2327-4662
- 2372-2541
- Cited by
- 17
- Licence
- Funders
- Key Project of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou, China (2019CXZX0037)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reputation-Based Truth Discovery With Long-Term Quality of Source in Internet of Things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2021.3110511
- The paper
- Yan, L., Yang, K., & Yang, S. (2022). Reputation-Based Truth Discovery With Long-Term Quality of Source in Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2021.3110511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.