The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ART: An Attack-Resistant Trust Management Scheme for Securing Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks
Abstract
Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) have the potential to transform the way people travel through the creation of a safe interoperable wireless communications network that includes cars, buses, traffic signals, cell phones, and other devices. However, VANETs are vulnerable to security threats due to increasing reliance on communication, computing, and control technologies. The unique security and privacy challenges posed by VANETs include integrity (data trust), confidentiality, nonrepudiation, access control, real-time operational constraints/demands, availability, and privacy protection. The trustworthiness of VANETs could be improved by addressing holistically both data trust, which is defined as the assessment of whether or not and to what extent the reported traffic data are trustworthy, and node trust, which is defined as how trustworthy the nodes in VANETs are. In this paper, an attack-resistant trust management scheme (ART) is proposed for VANETs that is able to detect and cope with malicious attacks and also evaluate the trustworthiness of both data and mobile nodes in VANETs. Specially, data trust is evaluated based on the data sensed and collected from multiple vehicles; node trust is assessed in two dimensions, i.e., functional trust and recommendation trust, which indicate how likely a node can fulfill its functionality and how trustworthy the recommendations from a node for other nodes will be, respectively. The effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed ART scheme is validated through extensive experiments. The proposed trust management theme is applicable to a wide range of VANET applications to improve traffic safety, mobility, and environmental protection with enhanced trustworthiness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Cited by
Future Intelligent and Secure Vehicular Network Toward 6G: Machine-Learning Approaches
Tang, F., Kawamoto, Y., Kato, N., & Liu, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2954595 · Cited by 620
A Survey on Recent Advances in Vehicular Network Security, Trust, and Privacy
Lu, Z., Qu, G., & Liu, Z. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2818888 · Cited by 608
A review on safety failures, security attacks, and available countermeasures for autonomous vehicles
Cui, J., Liew, L. S., Sabaliauskaite, G., & Zhou, F. (2019) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.12.006 · Cited by 298
Ali, E. S., Hasan, M. K., Hassan, R., Saeed, R. A., Hassan, M. B., Islam, S., Nafi, N. S., & Bevinakoppa, S. (2021) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2021/8868355 · Cited by 257
Security and privacy issues of UAV: A survey
Zhi, Y., Fu, Z., Sun, X., & Yu, J. (2020) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-018-1193-x · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., & Song, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 960-969
- ISSN
- 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0016
- OpenAlex
- W2305409997
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ART: An Attack-Resistant Trust Management Scheme for Securing Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tits.2015.2494017
- The paper
- Li, W., & Song, H. (2016). ART: An Attack-Resistant Trust Management Scheme for Securing Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2015.2494017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.