The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Advances on Federated Learning for Cybersecurity and Cybersecurity for Federated Learning for Internet of Things
Abstract
Decentralized paradigm in the field of cybersecurity and machine learning (ML) for the emerging Internet of Things (IoT) has gained a lot of attention from the government, academia, and industries in recent years. Federated cybersecurity (FC) is regarded as a revolutionary concept to make the IoT safer and more efficient in the future. This emerging concept has the potential of detecting security threats, taking countermeasures, and limiting the spreading of threats over the IoT network system efficiently. An objective of cybersecurity is achieved by forming the federation of the learned and shared model on top of various participants. Federated learning (FL), which is regarded as a privacy-aware ML model, is particularly useful to secure the vulnerable IoT environment. In this article, we start with background and comparison of centralized learning, distributed on-site learning, and FL, which is then followed by a survey of the application of FL to cybersecurity for IoT. This survey primarily focuses on the security aspect but it also discusses several approaches that address the performance issues (e.g., accuracy, latency, resource constraint, and others) associated with FL, which may impact the security and overall performance of the IoT. To anticipate the future evolution of this new paradigm, we discuss the main ongoing research efforts, challenges, and research trends in this area. With this article, readers can have a more thorough understanding of FL for cybersecurity as well as cybersecurity for FL, different security attacks, and countermeasures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,156
Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks
Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2005) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2000.926982 · Cited by 14,140
Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions
Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2020.2975749 · Cited by 6,210
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Moustafa, N., & Slay, J. (2015) · 2015 Military Communications and Information Systems Conference (MilCIS) · doi:10.1109/milcis.2015.7348942 · Cited by 4,033
VGGFace2: A Dataset for Recognising Faces across Pose and Age
Cao, Q., Shen, L., Xie, W., Parkhi, O. M., & Zisserman, A. (2018) · 2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018) · doi:10.1109/fg.2018.00020 · Cited by 3,032
Cited by
Handling privacy-sensitive medical data with federated learning: Challenges and future directions
Aouedi, O., Sacco, A., Piamrat, K., & Marchetto, G. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3185673 · Cited by 165
A Review of Anomaly Detection Strategies to Detect Threats to Cyber-Physical Systems
Jeffrey, N., Tan, Q., & Villar, J. R. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12153283 · Cited by 160
Blockchain-Based Personalized Federated Learning for Internet of Medical Things
Lian, Z., Wang, W., Han, Z., & Su, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing · doi:10.1109/tsusc.2023.3279111 · Cited by 75
Federated Transfer–Ordered–Personalized Learning for Driver Monitoring Application
Yuan, L., Su, L., & Wang, Z. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3279273 · Cited by 40
Threats and Defenses in the Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges
Li, Y., Guo, Z., Yang, N., Chen, H., Yuan, D., & Ding, W. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3563537 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghimire, B., & Rawat, D. B.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2022-06-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 8229-8249
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W4210960727
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 33.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Advances on Federated Learning for Cybersecurity and Cybersecurity for Federated Learning for Internet of Things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2022.3150363
- The paper
- Ghimire, B., & Rawat, D. B. (2022). Recent Advances on Federated Learning for Cybersecurity and Cybersecurity for Federated Learning for Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2022.3150363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
