The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mobility Digital Twin: Concept, Architecture, Case Study, and Future Challenges
Open accessAbstract
A Digital Twin is a digital replica of a living or nonliving physical entity, and this emerging technology attracted extensive attention from different industries during the past decade. Although a few Digital Twin studies have been conducted in the transportation domain very recently, there is no systematic research with a holistic framework connecting various mobility entities together. In this study, a mobility digital twin (MDT) framework is developed, which is defined as an artificial intelligence (AI)-based data-driven cloud–edge–device framework for mobility services. This MDT consists of three building blocks in the physical space (namely,Human,Vehicle, andTraffic), and their associated Digital Twins in the digital space. An example cloud–edge architecture is built with Amazon Web Services (AWS) to accommodate the proposed MDT framework and to fulfill its digital functionalities of storage, modeling, learning, simulation, and prediction. A case study of the personalized adaptive cruise control (P-ACC) system is conducted, which integrates the key microservices of all three digital building blocks of the MDT framework: 1) theHuman Digital Twinwith user management and driver type classification; 2) theVehicle Digital Twinwith cloud-based advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS); and 3) theTraffic Digital Twinwith traffic flow monitoring and variable speed limit. Future challenges of the proposed MDT framework are discussed toward the end of the article, including standardization, AI for computing, public or private cloud service, and network heterogeneity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Internet of Things: A survey
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · Cited by 15,613
A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems
Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015) · Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 · Cited by 5,113
CARLA: An open urban driving simulator
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.03938 · Cited by 3,718
The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles
Glaessgen, E., & Stargel, D. (2012) · 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA · doi:10.2514/6.2012-1818 · Cited by 2,404 · cited 2×
“Along with its rapid development in different domains during the past decade, including aeronautics and space [4], [7], robotics [8], [9], manufacturing [10], [11], and informatics [12], the Digital Twin also has a huge potential in the transportation domain.”
BackgroundDedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) Standards in the United States
Kenney, J. B. (2011) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2132790 · Cited by 2,366
Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Ziebart, B. D., Maas, A. L., Bagnell, J. A., & Dey, A. K. (2018) · doi:10.1184/r1/6555512 · Cited by 1,869
About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing
Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., & Bettenhausen, K. D. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141 · Cited by 1,474 · cited 1×
“Along with its rapid development in different domains during the past decade, including aeronautics and space [4], [7], robotics [8], [9], manufacturing [10], [11], and informatics [12], the Digital Twin also has a huge potential in the transportation domain.”
BackgroundRecent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment
Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2013) · Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.005 · Cited by 1,090
Wang, F.-Y. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2010.2060218 · Cited by 856
A survey on vehicular cloud computing
Whaiduzzaman, M., Sookhak, M., Gani, A., & Buyya, R. (2014) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2013.08.004 · Cited by 750
Cited by
Federated Transfer–Ordered–Personalized Learning for Driver Monitoring Application
Yuan, L., Su, L., & Wang, Z. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3279273 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Gupta, R., Han, K., Wang, H., Ganlath, A., Ammar, N., & Tiwari, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2022-09-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 17452-17467
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2541
- OpenAlex
- W4225537087
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 30.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mobility Digital Twin: Concept, Architecture, Case Study, and Future Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2022.3156028
- The paper
- Wang, Z., Gupta, R., Han, K., Wang, H., Ganlath, A., Ammar, N., & Tiwari, P. (2022). Mobility Digital Twin: Concept, Architecture, Case Study, and Future Challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2022.3156028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.