Cited by 104IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Augmented Intelligence of Things for Emergency Vehicle Secure Trajectory Prediction and Task Offloading

Wu, Xiang, Dong, Jian, Bao, Wei, Zou, Baowen, Wang, Lili, Wang, Huanhuan·2024·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Augmented Intelligence of Things (AIoT) combines augmented intelligence algorithms with the massive data collected by IoT devices, enabling more advanced decision-making. The typical application of AIoT is edge computing (EC), which provides computational and storage resources at the edge to support vehicle decision making for computation tasks. With the development of EC, task offloading has become a hopeful paradigm for assisting the time-sensitive tasks of resource-limited vehicles, such as emergency rescue vehicles by deploying at roadside units (RSUs). However, the effectiveness of task offloading for emergency vehicles is hindered by the timeliness of trajectory data and the concern regarding vehicle location. Therefore, this study introduces a secure task offloading scheme relying on the real-time trajectory prediction, named STODRL. First, this study proposes a temporal differential privacy method to disturb vehicular location information to avoid suffering from malicious stealing. Second, a vehicular trajectory prediction method using the temporal convolutional network (TCN) is designed to improve the task offloading precision by offering supplemental trajectory information. Moreover, the scheme employs a reinforcement learning method to offload computational requests effectively and avoid dimensional disasters. Simulated results validate that the STODRL outperforms the existing methods, significantly reducing task completion delays and ensuring the security of location information.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2024.3417285

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2008, NGSIM: Next Generation Simulation (Lankershim Boulevard Dataset)
  2. 10.3390/e23080961 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wu, X., Dong, J., Bao, W., Zou, B., Wang, L., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
  • Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
  • China Electronics Standardization Institute (CN)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2024-11-15
Volume
11
Issue
22
Pages
36030-36043
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W4400111381
Cited by
95
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2
FWCI
15.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Key Project of Basic Science Research in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province (22KJA120002)
  • Unveiling and Leading Project of XZHMU (JBGS202204)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
emergency vehicles, task offloading, trajectory prediction, edge computing, differential privacy, temporal convolutional network, reinforcement learning, roadside units, vehicular networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review