CMOS-Based High-Density Silicon Microprobe Arrays for Electronic Depth Control in Intracortical Neural Recording
Abstract
This paper reports on a novel high-density CMOS-based silicon microprobe array for intracortical recording applications. In contrast to existing systems, CMOS multiplexing units are integrated directly on the slender, needle-like probe shafts. Single-shaft probes and four-shaft combs have been realized with 188 and 752 electrodes, respectively, with a pitch of 40$\mu\hbox{m}$arranged in two columns along 4-mm-long probe shafts. Rather than performing a mechanical translation of the probe shaft relative to the brain tissue to optimize the distance between electrodes and neurons, the electrode position is adjusted by electronically switching between the different electrodes along the shaft. The paper presents the probe concept, the CMOS circuitry design, the applied post-CMOS fabrication process, and the assembled probe systems.$\hfill$[2011-0062]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some neural interface devices have been fabricated with high electrode densities, but their designs have limited their use to specific central nervous system structures such as cortical grey matter or hippocampal slices.
“Some neural interface devices have been fabricated with high electrode densities; however, their designs have limited the use of these arrays to specific central nervous system structures, such as cortical grey matter (6.25 electrodes/mm 2 [12,13]; >150 electrodes/mm 2 [17,18]) or hippocampal slices (<11 electrodes/mm 2 [19]).”
From A new high-density (25 electrodes/mm<sup>2</sup>) penetrating microelectrode array for recording and stimulating sub-millimeter neuroanatomical structures (2013) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Seidl, K., Herwik, S., Torfs, T., Neves, H. P., Paul, O., & Ruther, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- IMEC (BE)
- Venue
- Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1439-1448
- ISSN
- 1057-7157 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105348529
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
- Keywords
- high-density electrode arrays, neural interfaces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review