The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing passwords, tokens, and biometrics for user authentication
Abstract
For decades, the password has been the standard means for user authentication on computers. However, as users are required to remember more, longer, and changing passwords, it is evident that a more convenient and secure solution to user authentication is necessary. This paper examines passwords, security tokens, and biometrics-which we collectively call authenticators-and compares these authenticators and their combinations. We examine their effectiveness against several attacks and suitability for particular security specifications such as compromise detection and nonrepudiation. Examples of authenticator combinations and protocols are described to show tradeoffs and solutions that meet chosen, practical requirements. The paper endeavors to offer a comprehensive picture of user authentication solutions for the purposes of evaluating options for use and identifying deficiencies requiring further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- Kahn, 1996, The Codebreakers: The Story of Secret Writing
- Stocksdale, NSA Glossary of Terms Used in Security and Intrusion Detection
- Rescorla, 2000, SSL and TLS: Designing and Building Secure Systems
- 2001, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication, FIPS-197
- 10.1145/359168.359172 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0167-4048(89)90049-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-4048(89)90006-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/0-387-34805-0_6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-4048(95)00003-Q · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-4048(97)00008-4 · doi:10.1016/s0167-4048(97)00008-4
- 10.1016/S0167-4048(00)06027-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-4048(00)07023-1 · DOI
- Smith, 2002, Authentication, From Passwords to Public Keys, 255
- Jain, 1998, Kluwer
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-4036-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9781119644682 · DOI · Paper page
- Stallings, 1999, Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice, 490
- 10.1002/9781119183471 · DOI · Paper page
- Weiss, 1988, Method and apparatus for positively identifying an individual
- O’Gorman, Seven issues with human authentication technologies, 185
- 10.1117/12.462719 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1147/sj.403.0614 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/RISP.1992.213269 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/49.223865 · DOI · Paper page
- Wu, The secure remote password protocol, 97
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1023799 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, CCIMB, Common Criteria Interpretations Management Board, 8
- 10.1016/S0167-4048(00)05029-X · doi:10.1016/s0167-4048(00)05029-x
- Schneier, 1998, Biometrics: Truths and fictions
- 10.1109/99.641608 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/100.755813 · doi:10.1109/100.755813
- Rigney, 2000, Remote Authentication Dial in User Service (RADIUS), 10.17487/rfc2865 · DOI · Paper page
- Black, 2000, Internet Security Protocols: Protecting IP Traffic, 113
- Rivest, 1992, The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm, 10.17487/rfc1321 · DOI · Paper page
- Steiner, Kerberos: An authentication service for open network systems, 191
- Kohl, 1993, The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5), 10.17487/rfc1510 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/359657.359659 · DOI · Paper page
- Taschek, 2002, Liberty alliance or passport?
- Stinson, 2002, Cryptography Theory and Practice
- 1995, U.S. Dept. Commerce, Nat. Inst. Sci. Technol. (NIST)
- McCabe, ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2000 Data Format for the Interchange of Fingerprint, Facial, and Scar Mark & Tattoo (SMT) Information
- 10.17487/rfc2828 · DOI · Paper page
- Howard, 2000, Designing Secure Web-Based Applications for Microsoft Windows 2000, 407
- 2002, Oxford Univ. Press
- 10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00038-9 · DOI
- 10.1109/89.861378 · DOI
- Rabiner, 1993, Fundamentals of Speech Recognition
- van Renesse, 1994, Optical Document Security
- 10.1006/dspr.1999.0355 · DOI
- Blackburn, 2001, FRVT 2000 Evaluation Report
- 10.1109/34.990140 · DOI · Paper page
- Mansfield, 2001, Biometric Product Testing Final Report
Cited by
The Quest to Replace Passwords: A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Web Authentication Schemes
Bonneau, J., Herley, C., Oorschot, P. C. V., & Stajano, F. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2012.44 · Cited by 1,110
Security for Industrial Communication Systems
Dzung, D., Naedele, M., Von Hoff, T. P., & Crevatin, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2005.849714 · Cited by 386
Laaki, H., Miche, Y., & Tammi, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2897018 · Cited by 341
Gunson, N., Marshall, D., Morton, H., & Jack, M. (2011) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2010.12.001 · Cited by 188
Wang, F., & De Filippi, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00028 · Cited by 143
“…individuals have enrolled into the system, the system checks whether these individuals have the proper permissions to access a particular service or to benefit from a particular type of aid, by matching a new biometric sample against the biometric template created during enrollment (O’Gorman, 2003).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Gorman, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2021-2040
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111303254
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing passwords, tokens, and biometrics for user authentication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2003.819611
- The paper
- O'Gorman, L. (2003). Comparing passwords, tokens, and biometrics for user authentication. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2003.819611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.