Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design Tools for an Emerging SoC Technology: Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

Walus, K., Jullien, G.A.·2006·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

The future of system-on-chip (SoC) technologies, based on the scaling of current FET-based integrated circuitry, is being predicted to reach fabrication limits by the year 2015. Economic limits may be reached before that time. Continued scaling of electronic devices to molecular scales will undoubtedly require a paradigm shift from the FET-based switch to an alternative mechanism of information representation and processing. This paradigm shift will also have to encompass the tools and design culture that have made the current SoC technology possible-the ability to design monolithic integrated circuits with many hundreds of millions of transistors. In this paper, we examine the initial development of a tool to automate the design of one of the promising emerging nanoelectronic technologies, quantum-dot cellular automata, which has been proposed as a computing paradigm based on single electron effects within quantum dots and molecules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jproc.2006.875791

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Walus, K., & Jullien, G. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
2006-06
Volume
94
Issue
6
Pages
1225-1244
ISSN
  • 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2256
OpenAlex
W2155723362
Cited by
217
References
2
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.