The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamic Watermarking: Active Defense of Networked Cyber–Physical Systems
Open accessAbstract
The coming decades may see the large scale deployment of networked cyber-physical systems to address global needs in areas such as energy, water, health care, and transportation. However, as recent events have shown, such systems are vulnerable to cyber attacks. Being safety critical, their disruption or misbehavior can cause economic losses or injuries and loss of life. It is therefore important to secure such networked cyber-physical systems against attacks. In the absence of credible security guarantees, there will be resistance to the proliferation of cyber-physical systems, which are much needed to meet global needs in critical infrastructures and services. This paper addresses the problem of secure control of networked cyber-physical systems. This problem is different from the problem of securing the communication network, since cyber-physical systems at their very essence need sensors and actuators that interface with the physical plant, and malicious agents may tamper with sensors or actuators, as recent attacks have shown. We consider physical plants that are being controlled by multiple actuators and sensors communicating over a network, where some sensors could be “malicious,” meaning that they may not report the measurements that they observe. We address a general technique by which the actuators can detect the actions of malicious sensors in the system and disable closed-loop control based on their information. This technique, called “watermarking,” employs the technique of actuators injecting private excitation into the system, which will reveal malicious tampering with signals. We show how such an active defense can be used to secure networked systems of sensors and actuators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cybersecurity of industrial cyber-physical systems: A review
Kayan, H., Nunes, M., Rana, O., Burnap, P., & Perera, C. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3510410 · Cited by 261
State of the art of cyber-physical systems security: An automatic control perspective
Zacchia Lun, Y., D’Innocenzo, A., Smarra, F., Malavolta, I., & Di Benedetto, M. D. (2019) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.006 · Cited by 211
Deep learning for signal authentication and security in massive internet-of-things systems
Ferdowsi, A., & Saad, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2018.2878025 · Cited by 160
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Survey
Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Gong, S., Niyato, D., Wang, P., Liang, Y.-C., & Kim, D. I. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.07862 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Satchidanandan, B., & Kumar, P. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-240
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2963445270
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Watermarking: Active Defense of Networked Cyber–Physical Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2016.2575064
- The paper
- Satchidanandan, B., & Kumar, P. R. (2017). Dynamic Watermarking: Active Defense of Networked Cyber–Physical Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2016.2575064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.