Cited by 261Network Security and Intrusion DetectionSmart Grid Security and ResilienceInformation and Cyber Security

Cybersecurity of industrial cyber-physical systems: A review

Open access
Kayan, Hakan, Nunes, Matthew, Rana, Omer, Burnap, Pete, Perera, Charith·2022·ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract

Industrial cyber-physical systems ( ICPSs ) manage critical infrastructures by controlling the processes based on the “physics” data gathered by edge sensor networks. Recent innovations in ubiquitous computing and communication technologies have prompted the rapid integration of highly interconnected systems to ICPSs. Hence, the “security by obscurity” principle provided by air-gapping is no longer followed. As the interconnectivity in ICPSs increases, so does the attack surface. Industrial vulnerability assessment reports have shown that a variety of new vulnerabilities have occurred due to this transition. Although there are existing surveys in this context, very little is mentioned regarding the outputs of these reports. While these reports show that the most exploited vulnerabilities occur due to weak boundary protection, these vulnerabilities also occur due to limited or ill-defined security policies. However, current literature focuses on intrusion detection systems ( IDSs ), network traffic analysis ( NTA ) methods, or anomaly detection techniques. Hence, finding a solution for the problems mentioned in these reports is relatively hard. We bridge this gap by defining and reviewing ICPSs from a cybersecurity perspective. In particular, multi-dimensional adaptive attack taxonomy is presented and utilized for evaluating real-life ICPS cyber incidents. Finally, we identify the general shortcomings and highlight the points that cause a gap in existing literature while defining future research directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3510410

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [22]Steven T. Bushby and H. Michael Newman. 2002. BACnet Today. ASHRAE Journal 10 (2002), 10–18.
  2. [97]Robert M. Lee, Michael J. Assante, and Tim Conway. 2014. German Steel Mill Cyber Attack. Ind. Control Syst. 30 (2014), 62.
  3. [104]Zhihong Lin and Stephanie Pearson. 2013. An inside look at industrial Ethernet communication protocols. Technical Report. Texas Instruments.
  4. IEEE Ind. Electronics Mag. 5, 4 (2011), 23–34.
  5. [139]Ragunathan (Raj) Rajkumar, Insup Lee, Lui Sha, and John Stankovic. 2010. Cyber-Physical Systems: The Next Computing Revolution. In Design Automation Conference. IEEE, Anaheim, California, 731–736.
  6. [165]Ted Thornhill. 2014. San Francisco Pranksters Hack Road Sign to Warn Drivers of Godzilla Attack. Retrieved August 21, 2020 from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632556/Godzilla-Attack-Turn-Pranksters-hack-San-Francisco-road-sign-warn-drivers-just-movie-makes-monster-93-2million-box-office.html [166] unstats.un.org. 2020. UNSD — ISIC. Retrieved August 29, 2020 from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/ ISIC.cshtml#:~:text=The%20International%20Standard%20Industrial%20Classification,statistics%20according%20to% 20such%20activities. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: February 2022. Cybersecurity of Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems: A Review 35 [167] us cert.cisa.gov. 2013. ICS-CERT MONITOR. Retrieved August 01, 2020 from https://us-cert.cisa.gov/sites/default/ files/Monitors/ICS-CERT_Monitor_Apr-Jun2013.pdf [168] us cert.cisa.gov. 2015. NCCIC/ICS-CERT Industrial Control Systems Assessment Summary Report. , 25 pages. Retrieved August 26, 2020 from https://us-cert.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/Annual_Reports/FY2015_Industrial_Control_Systems_ Assessment_Summary_Report_S508C.pdf [169] us cert.cisa.gov. 2016. ICS-CERT Annual Assessment Report FY2016. , 24 pages.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kayan, H., Nunes, M., Rana, O., Burnap, P., & Perera, C.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2022-01-31
Volume
54
Issue
11s
Pages
1-35
ISSN
  • 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7341
OpenAlex
W3119687955
Cited by
261
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 3
FWCI
20.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • EPSRC PETRAS (EP/S035362/1)
  • GCHQ National Resilience Fellowship
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
industrial cyber-physical systems, industrial cybersecurity, critical infrastructure, attack surface, vulnerability assessment, cyber incidents, intrusion detection systems, network traffic analysis, anomaly detection, security policy, boundary protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review