Cited by 35Energy and Environment ImpactsMicrogrid Control and OptimizationICT in Developing Communities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrical Minigrids for Development: Lessons From the Field

Open access
Bahaj, Abubakr S., James, Patrick A. B.·2019·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

Energy services are crucial to human wellbeing and development, and without reliable energy, it is difficult to escape subsistence lifestyles and poverty. Here, we report on four identical capacity rural minigrid interventions undertaken in Kenya and Uganda with differing socioeconomic characteristics and demographics. The research outcomes presented briefly discuss the preparation stages of the interventions including community surveys that informed the technical design, deployment phases, and setup of the community cooperatives to manage the minigrid projects. The main focus here is on lessons learned, including system design and minigrid performance under various load profiles. The results show a clear and increasing uptake of power by the communities with intensities varying depending on the electricity tariff used. Across the four minigrids, daily electricity growth rates are seen to vary by a factor of 8. The Ugandan minigrids operated at close to utility grid tariff and reached the 28-kWh/day design limit within two years. By contrast, the Kenyan minigrids charged a higher cost recovery tariff, which capped the demand and systems operate below the design limit. These findings have implications not only to system design but also to system stability and longevity. The approach taken here, of community centered cooperatives running the delivered minigrids, is now embedded within the rural electrification authorities/agencies in both countries, with additional similar projects being planned in 2019/2020. The application, ramifications, and replication of such a minigrid concept as compared to other approaches are also discussed in this paper.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jproc.2019.2924594

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Electricity access issues to be considered and where minigrid sits within the scope of other technologies, business models, regulations, sustainability, scalability, and tariffs. Here, SHS is solar home systems, PPA is power purchase agreements, and O & M is operations and maintenance.
Fig. 1 Electricity access issues to be considered and where minigrid sits within the scope of other technologies, business models, regulations, sustainability, scalability, and tariffs. Here, SHS is solar home systems, PPA is power purchase agreements, and O & M is operations and maintenance.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Load profile for Kitonyoni based on needs of the assessment baseline survey. Peak electrical demand was estimated at around 3.2 kWp with a daily demand of 28 kWh. There was no seasonal variation in demand assumed.
Fig. 2 Load profile for Kitonyoni based on needs of the assessment baseline survey. Peak electrical demand was estimated at around 3.2 kWp with a daily demand of 28 kWh. There was no seasonal variation in demand assumed.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Kitonyoni plant room comprising four charge controllers, 48-V battery bank, and twin inverters. Data monitoring system is on the right-hand side below consumer units of twin distribution circuits. Diesel generator is located on the other side of central bulkhead added to the container.
Fig. 3 Kitonyoni plant room comprising four charge controllers, 48-V battery bank, and twin inverters. Data monitoring system is on the right-hand side below consumer units of twin distribution circuits. Diesel generator is located on the other side of central bulkhead added to the container.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Top: two-container system under freestanding PV canopy, Kitonyoni, Kenya. Bottom: two containers integrated into the canopy system, Kyamugarura, Uganda (no water collection).
Fig. 4 Top: two-container system under freestanding PV canopy, Kitonyoni, Kenya. Bottom: two containers integrated into the canopy system, Kyamugarura, Uganda (no water collection).CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Top: example of poor local contractor quality and poor understanding of electrical risk. Bottom: typical field remediation of poor-quality contractor deployment.
Fig. 5 Top: example of poor local contractor quality and poor understanding of electrical risk. Bottom: typical field remediation of poor-quality contractor deployment.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 6 Average daily profile for Kitonyoni, 2012-2018. Consumption Profile development is influenced by tariff price and charging mechanism ($1 BP 101 KSh, August 2018).
Fig. 6 Average daily profile for Kitonyoni, 2012-2018. Consumption Profile development is influenced by tariff price and charging mechanism ($1 BP 101 KSh, August 2018).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 7 Kyamugarura minigrid (July 2017, monthly average profile) reaching its daily capacity limit within 24 months of commissioning. Average July 2017, 31 kWh/day being delivered for a 28-kWh/day design load.
Fig. 7 Kyamugarura minigrid (July 2017, monthly average profile) reaching its daily capacity limit within 24 months of commissioning. Average July 2017, 31 kWh/day being delivered for a 28-kWh/day design load.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 8 Daily power factor variation for Kitonyoni minigrid, August 28, 2014. Daylight hours are shown in white.
Fig. 8 Daily power factor variation for Kitonyoni minigrid, August 28, 2014. Daylight hours are shown in white.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 9 Power factor variation for Kitonyoni minigrid, 2014-2017.
Fig. 9 Power factor variation for Kitonyoni minigrid, 2014-2017.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 10 Linear correlation of the measured daily demand growth with a number of days of operation. 28-kWh/day design load. Kitonyoni y BP 0.0045x B7 10.0, r2 BP 0.71, Oloika y BP 0.022x B7 10.1, r2 BP 0.81, Kanyegaramire y BP 0.037x B7 6.3, r2 BP 0.88, and Kyamugarura y BP 0.032x B7 6.7, r2 BP 0.68.
Fig. 10 Linear correlation of the measured daily demand growth with a number of days of operation. 28-kWh/day design load. Kitonyoni y BP 0.0045x B7 10.0, r2 BP 0.71, Oloika y BP 0.022x B7 10.1, r2 BP 0.81, Kanyegaramire y BP 0.037x B7 6.3, r2 BP 0.88, and Kyamugarura y BP 0.032x B7 6.7, r2 BP 0.68.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 13
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 14
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 15
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Trends in Microgrid Control

    Olivares, D. E., Mehrizi-Sani, A., Etemadi, A. H., Canizares, C. A., Iravani, R., Kazerani, M., Hajimiragha, A. H., Gomis-Bellmunt, O., Saeedifard, M., Palma-Behnke, R., et al. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514 · Cited by 3,137

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1016/j.deveng.2017.12.001 · DOI
  2. 2014, Islamic Development Bank and Development Partners Launch US
  3. 2014, IRENA/ADFD Project Facility
  4. hansen, 2014, Review of solar PV market development in East Africa
  5. clairand, 0, Power generation planning of Galapagos’ microgrid considering electric vehicles and induction stoves, IEEE Trans Sustain Energy
  6. lee, 2016, Barriers to electrification for ‘under grid’ households rural Kenya
  7. 10.1016/j.deveng.2015.12.001 · DOI
  8. millien, 2017, Electricity supply reliability and households decision to connect to the grid, Documents de travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne
  9. 2018, UK Power Networks
  10. 2018, Energy for Development Network
  11. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.03.014 · DOI
  12. 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034002 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2018, Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL) Database Access to Electricity Rural (% of Rural Population)
  15. 2018, Fortis Unum Clustering Mini-Grid Networks to Widen Energy Access and Enhance Utility Network Resilience
  16. 10.1016/j.esd.2017.09.012 · DOI
  17. 10.19088/1968-2017.161 · DOI
  18. 2017, Upscaling Mini Grids for Low Cost and Timely Access to Electricity (English) Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP)
  19. 2017, A/RES/71/313 Work of the Statistical Commission Pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
  20. 2015, Green Mini-Grids Market Development Program SEforALL Africa Hub African Development Bank
  21. 2018, World Energy Outlook 2017 Executive Summary
  22. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.031 · DOI
  23. 10.3390/en12050778 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.010 · DOI
  25. 2018, HOMER Pro Version History Legacy Version 2 68
  26. bahaj, 2015, Transforming rural communities through mini-grids, Smart Villages New thinking for off-grid communities worldwide, 29
  27. 2018, Clarke Construction Essex Limited
  28. 2018, Jane Wernick Associates

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bahaj, A. S., & James, P. A. B.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
2019-09
Volume
107
Issue
9
Pages
1967-1980
ISSN
  • 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2256
OpenAlex
W2966665436
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the IEEE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G06394X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
rural electrification, community cooperatives, electricity tariffs, cost recovery, electricity profile, system stability, Kenya, Uganda, lessons learned

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical Minigrids for Development: Lessons From the Field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2019.2924594
The paper
Bahaj, A. S., & James, P. A. B. (2019). Electrical Minigrids for Development: Lessons From the Field. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2019.2924594