The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Image Reconstruction: From Sparsity to Data-Adaptive Methods and Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
The field of medical image reconstruction has seen roughly four types of methods. The first type tended to be analytical methods, such as filtered backprojection (FBP) for X-ray computed tomography (CT) and the inverse Fourier transform for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), based on simple mathematical models for the imaging systems. These methods are typically fast, but have suboptimal properties such as poor resolution-noise tradeoff for CT. A second type is iterative reconstruction methods based on more complete models for the imaging system physics and, where appropriate, models for the sensor statistics. These iterative methods improved image quality by reducing noise and artifacts. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved methods among these have been based on relatively simple regularization models. A third type of methods has been designed to accommodate modified data acquisition methods, such as reduced sampling in MRI and CT to reduce scan time or radiation dose. These methods typically involve mathematical image models involving assumptions such as sparsity or low rank. A fourth type of methods replaces mathematically designed models of signals and systems with data-driven or adaptive models inspired by the field of machine learning. This article focuses on the two most recent trends in medical image reconstruction: methods based on sparsity or low-rank models and data-driven methods based on machine learning techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596 · Cited by 17,949
Candes, E. J., Romberg, J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.862083 · Cited by 15,639
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
$rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation
Aharon, M., Elad, M., & Bruckstein, A. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2006.881199 · Cited by 9,451
Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering
Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., & Egiazarian, K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.901238 · Cited by 9,283
Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising
Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Meng, D., & Zhang, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2662206 · Cited by 8,983
Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging
Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 · Cited by 6,952
Robust principal component analysis?
Candès, E. J., Li, X., Ma, Y., & Wright, J. (2011) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1970392.1970395 · Cited by 6,921
Cited by
Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction
Wang, G., Ye, J. C., & De Man, B. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z · Cited by 531
Self-citationThe promise of artificial intelligence and deep learning in PET and SPECT imaging
Arabi, H., AkhavanAllaf, A., Sanaat, A., Shiri, I., & Zaidi, H. (2021) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.008 · Cited by 268
Data drift in medical machine learning: implications and potential remedies
Sahiner, B., Chen, W., Samala, R. K., & Petrick, N. (2023) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20220878 · Cited by 279
Guo, P., Wang, P., Zhou, J., Jiang, S., & Patel, V. M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00245 · Cited by 193
Implicit data crimes: Machine learning bias arising from misuse of public data
Shimron, E., Tamir, J. I., Wang, K., & Lustig, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2117203119 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravishankar, S., Ye, J. C., & Fessler, J. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-109
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W2942199805
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 148
- FWCI
- 21.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image Reconstruction: From Sparsity to Data-Adaptive Methods and Machine Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2019.2936204
- The paper
- Ravishankar, S., Ye, J. C., & Fessler, J. A. (2020). Image Reconstruction: From Sparsity to Data-Adaptive Methods and Machine Learning. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2019.2936204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
