Cited by 237Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisDigital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 261 of the 287 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generative Adversarial Networks for Image and Video Synthesis: Algorithms and Applications

Open access
Liu, Ming-Yu, Huang, Xun, Yu, Jiahui, Wang, Ting-Chun, Mallya, Arun·2021·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

The generative adversarial network (GAN) framework has emerged as a powerful tool for various image and video synthesis tasks, allowing the synthesis of visual content in an unconditional or input-conditional manner. It has enabled the generation of high-resolution photorealistic images and videos, a task that was challenging or impossible with prior methods. It has also led to the creation of many new applications in content creation. In this article, we provide an overview of GANs with a special focus on algorithms and applications for visual synthesis. We cover several important techniques to stabilize GAN training, which has a reputation for being notoriously difficult. We also discuss its applications to image translation, image processing, video synthesis, and neural rendering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jproc.2021.3049196

Cites

261 of 261 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 287 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
  2. lei ba, 2016, Layer normalization, arXiv 1607 06450
  3. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00762 · DOI
  4. kingma, 2018, Glow: Generative flow with invertible $1\times1$ convolutions, Proc NeurIPS, 10215
  5. tieleman, 2012, Lecture 6.5—RmsProp: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude, Proc Neural Netw Mach Learn (COURSERA)
  6. 10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00460 · DOI
  8. bi?kowski, 2018, Demystifying MMD GANs, Proc ICLR

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–237 of 237

Metadata

Authors
Liu, M.-Y., Huang, X., Yu, J., Wang, T.-C., & Mallya, A.
Affiliations
  • Nvidia (United States) (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
2021-05
Volume
109
Issue
5
Pages
839-862
ISSN
  • 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2256
OpenAlex
W3126434301
Cited by
236
References
287
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 27
FWCI
14.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the IEEE (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
generative adversarial networks, image generation, video generation, GAN training stability, image-to-image translation, image processing, neural rendering, realistic image synthesis, conditional generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review