Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,118

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 208 of the 208 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Imaging Traits, Technology Trends, Case Studies With Progress Highlights, and Future Promises

Open access
Zhou, S. Kevin, Greenspan, Hayit, Davatzikos, Christos, Duncan, James S., Van Ginneken, Bram, Madabhushi, Anant, Prince, Jerry L., Rueckert, Daniel, Summers, Ronald M.·2021·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

Since its renaissance, deep learning has been widely used in various medical imaging tasks and has achieved remarkable success in many medical imaging applications, thereby propelling us into the so-called artificial intelligence (AI) era. It is known that the success of AI is mostly attributed to the availability of big data with annotations for a single task and the advances in high performance computing. However, medical imaging presents unique challenges that confront deep learning approaches. In this survey paper, we first present traits of medical imaging, highlight both clinical needs and technical challenges in medical imaging, and describe how emerging trends in deep learning are addressing these issues. We cover the topics of network architecture, sparse and noisy labels, federating learning, interpretability, uncertainty quantification, etc. Then, we present several case studies that are commonly found in clinical practice, including digital pathology and chest, brain, cardiovascular, and abdominal imaging. Rather than presenting an exhaustive literature survey, we instead describe some prominent research highlights related to these case study applications. We conclude with a discussion and presentation of promising future directions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jproc.2021.3054390

Cites

208 of 208 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 208 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. campello, 2020, Multi-centre, multi-vendor & multi-disease cardiac image segmentation challenge (M&MS), Proc Med Image Comput Comput Assist Intervent (MICCAI)
  2. yang, 2019, Left ventricle full quantification challenge, Proc Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput -Assist Intervent
  3. simonyan, 2014, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, arXiv 1409 1556
  4. ronneberger, 2015, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, Proc Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Intervent (MICCAI), 234
  5. krizhevsky, 2012, ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 1097
  6. 2013, MIT Tech Rev 2013
  7. 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2956422 · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2956422
  8. simpson, 2019, A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithms, arXiv 1902 09063
  9. 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  10. zhou, 2017, Deep learning for medical image analysis
  11. yang, 2020, Smile-GANs: Semi-supervised clustering via GANs for dissecting brain disease heterogeneity from medical images, arXiv 2006 15255
  12. xu, 2017, 200x low-dose PET reconstruction using deep learning, arXiv 1712 04119
  13. tamada, 2018, Motion artifact reduction in abdominal MR imaging using the U-NET network, Proc ICMRM Sci Meeting KSMRM
  14. chen, 2019, Med3D: Transfer learning for 3D medical image analysis, arXiv 1904 00625
  15. raghu, 2019, Transfusion: Understanding transfer learning for medical imaging, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 3347
  16. howard, 2017, MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications, arXiv 1704 04861
  17. wolterink, 2017, Automatic segmentation and disease classification using cardiac cine MR images, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart ACDC and MMWHS Challenges, 101
  18. isensee, 2017, Automatic cardiac disease assessment on cine-MRI via time-series segmentation and domain specific features, Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart ACDC and MMWHS Challenges, 120
  19. börgers, 2012, Computational Radiology and Imaging Therapy and Diagnostics, 110
  20. beutel, 2000, Handbook of Medical Imaging Medical Image Processing and Analysis, 2
  21. prince, 2006, Medical Imaging Signals and Systems
  22. goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial nets, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 2672
  23. lee, 2015, Deeply-supervised nets, Proc Artif Intell Statist, 562
  24. huang, 2019, 3D U2-net: A 3D universal U-net for multi-domain medical image segmentation, Proc Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Intervent (MICCIAI), 291
  25. shi, 2020, Marginal loss and exclusion loss for partially supervised multi-organ segmentation, arXiv 2007 03868
  26. tang, 2020, E2Net: An edge enhanced network for accurate liver and tumor segmentation on CT scans, Proc Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Intervent (MICCAI), 512
  27. zhao, 2018, Federated learning with non-IID data, arXiv 1806 00582
  28. sheller, 2018, Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: A feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation, Proc Int MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop, 92
  29. roth, 2015, CT lymph nodes, The Cancer Imaging Archive
  30. 10.1016/0090-4295(85)90280-8 · doi:10.1016/0090-4295(85)90280-8
  31. bakas, 2018, Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge, arXiv 1811 02629
  32. li, 2017, Non-rigid image registration using fully convolutional networks with deep self-supervision, arXiv 1709 00799
  33. yao, 2020, A hierarchical feature constraint to camouflage medical adversarial attacks, arXiv 2012 09501
  34. liu, 2014, Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease with deep learning, Proc Int Symp Biomed Imag (ISBI), 1015
  35. lu, 2018, Multimodal and multiscale deep neural networks for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using structural MR and FDG-PET images, Sci Rep, 8, 1
  36. beutel, 2000, Handbook of Medical Imaging, 1
  37. gozes, 2020, Rapid AI development cycle for the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: Initial results for automated detection & patient monitoring using deep learning CT image analysis, arXiv 2003 05037
  38. 2019, Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System v1 1
  39. bankman, 2008, Handbook of Medical Image Processing and Analysis
  40. zhou, 2019, Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv
  41. 10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_5

Cited by

See all 1,118

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, S. K., Greenspan, H., Davatzikos, C., Duncan, J. S., Van Ginneken, B., Madabhushi, A., Prince, J. L., Rueckert, D., & Summers, R. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
2021-05
Volume
109
Issue
5
Pages
820-838
ISSN
  • 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2256
OpenAlex
W3074741277
Cited by
1,118
References
208
FWCI
31.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1U24CA199374-01, R01CA202752-01A1, R01CA208236-01A1, R01CA216579-01A1, R01CA220581-01A1, 1U01CA239055-01, 1U54CA254566-01, 1U01CA248226-01, 1R43EB028736-01)
  • VA Merit Review (IBX004121A)
  • Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Israeli Science Foundation
  • Ministry of Science & Technology
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Imaging Traits, Technology Trends, Case Studies With Progress Highlights, and Future Promises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jproc.2021.3054390
The paper
Zhou, S. K., Greenspan, H., Davatzikos, C., Duncan, J. S., Van Ginneken, B., Madabhushi, A., Prince, J. L., Rueckert, D., & Summers, R. M. (2021). A Review of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Imaging Traits, Technology Trends, Case Studies With Progress Highlights, and Future Promises. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2021.3054390

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.