The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Error modeling in stereo navigation
Abstract
In stereo navigation, a mobile robot estimates its position by tracking landmarks with on-board cameras. Previous systems for stereo navigation have suffered from poor accuracy, in part because they relied on scalar models of measurement error in triangulation. Using three-dimensional (3D) Gaussian distributions to model triangulation error is shown to lead to much better performance. How to compute the error model from image correspondences, estimate robot motion between frames, and update the global positions of the robot and the landmarks over time are discussed. Simulations show that, compared to scalar error models, the 3D Gaussian reduces the variance in robot position estimates and better distinguishes rotational from translational motion. A short indoor run with real images supported these conclusions and computed the final robot position to within two percent of distance and one degree of orientation. These results illustrate the importance of error modeling in stereo vision for this and other applications.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 1974, Applied Optimal Estimation
- gennery, 1980, Modelling the environment Of an exploring vehicle by means of stereo vision
- 10.1007/BF00126395 · DOI
- gill, 1981, Practical Optimization
- 10.1177/027836498400300301 · DOI
- hallam, 1983, Resolving observer motion by object tracking, Proc Int Joint Conf Artificial Intelligence
- hebert, 1983, Reconnaissance de formes tridimensionnelles
- 10.1109/OCEANS.1984.1152232 · DOI
- moravec, 1980, Obstacle Avoidance and Navigation in the Real World by a Seeing Robot Rover
- 10.1007/BF02291266 · DOI
- baird, 1985, Model-Based Image Matching Using Location
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767751 · DOI
- 10.1016/0004-3702(81)90028-X · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767755 · DOI
- elbert, 1984, Estimation and Control of Systems
- 10.1016/0146-664X(82)90081-8 · DOI
- anandan, 1985, Introducing a smoothness constraint in a matching approach for the computation of displacement fields, Proc ARPA JUS Workshop, 186
- 10.1109/ROBOT.1986.1087419 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1985.4767678 · DOI
- 1980, Manual of Photogrammetry
- solina, 1985, Errors in stereo due to quantization
- smith, 1985, On the Representation and Estimation of Spatial Uncertainty
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767471 · DOI
- thorpe, 1984, Vision and navigation for a robot rover
- 1978, Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control
- 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767853 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scaramuzza, D., & Fraundorfer, F. (2011) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2011.943233 · Cited by 1,550
Two years of Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers
Maimone, M., Cheng, Y., & Matthies, L. (2007) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20184 · Cited by 655
Self-citationVisual Odometry : Part II: Matching, Robustness, Optimization, and Applications
Fraundorfer, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2012) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2012.2182810 · Cited by 620
Terrain Adaptive Navigation for Planetary Rovers
Helmick, D., Angelova, A., & Matthies, L. (2009) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20292 · Cited by 103
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthies, L., & Shafer, S.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- ORCID
- Matthies, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-248
- ISSN
- 0882-4967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113560487
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 40.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Waterloo
- National Research Council Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
- Keywords
- error modeling, mobile robot localization, landmark tracking, image correspondence, robot motion estimation, positioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review