The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized consensus algorithms over large scale networks
Abstract
Various randomized consensus algorithms have been proposed in the literature. In some case randomness is due to the choice of a randomized network communication protocol. In other cases, randomness is simply caused by the potential unpredictability of the environment in which the distributed consensus algorithm is implemented. Conditions ensuring the convergence of these algorithms have already been proposed in the literature. As far as the rate of convergence of such algorithms, two approaches can be proposed. One is based on a mean square analysis, while a second is based on the concept of Lyapunov exponent. In this paper, by some concentration results, we prove that the mean square convergence analysis is the right approach when the number of agents is large. Differently from the existing literature, in this paper we do not stick to average preserving algorithms. Instead, we allow to reach consensus at a point which may differ from the average of the initial states. The advantage of such algorithms is that they do not require bidirectional communication among agents and thus they apply to more general contexts. Moreover, in many important contexts it is possible to prove that the displacement from the initial average tends to zero, when the number of agents goes to infinity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Cited by
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 553
Spread of (mis)information in social networks
Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & ParandehGheibi, A. (2010) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2010.01.005 · Cited by 444
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part II
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2018) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.03.005 · Cited by 294
Distributed Primal–Dual Subgradient Method for Multiagent Optimization via Consensus Algorithms
Yuan, D., Xu, S., & Zhao, H. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2160394 · Cited by 255
Distributed multi-agent optimization with state-dependent communication
Lobel, I., Ozdaglar, A., & Feijer, D. (2011) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-011-0467-x · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Fagnani, F., & Zampieri, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 634-649
- ISSN
- 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134252677
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 59.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized consensus algorithms over large scale networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsac.2008.080506
- The paper
- Fagnani, F., & Zampieri, S. (2008). Randomized consensus algorithms over large scale networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2008.080506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.