The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resilient Asymptotic Consensus in Robust Networks
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of resilient in-network consensus in the presence of misbehaving nodes. Secure and fault-tolerant consensus algorithms typically assume knowledge of nonlocal information; however, this assumption is not suitable for large-scale dynamic networks. To remedy this, we focus on local strategies that provide resilience to faults and compromised nodes. We design a consensus protocol based on local information that is resilient to worst-case security breaches, assuming the compromised nodes have full knowledge of the network and the intentions of the other nodes. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the normal nodes to reach asymptotic consensus despite the influence of the misbehaving nodes under different threat assumptions. We show that traditional metrics such as connectivity are not adequate to characterize the behavior of such algorithms, and develop a novel graph-theoretic property referred to as network robustness. Network robustness formalizes the notion of redundancy of direct information exchange between subsets of nodes in the network, and is a fundamental property for analyzing the behavior of certain distributed algorithms that use only local information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 1×
“Let M [t] and m[t] be the maximum and minimum values of the normal nodes at time-step t, respectively.”
BackgroundCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
The Byzantine generals problem
Lamport, L., Shostak, R., & Pease, M. (1982) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/357172.357176 · Cited by 6,023
Distributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms
Tsitsiklis, J., Bertsekas, D., & Athans, M. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1986.1104412 · Cited by 1,967
Cited by
Ding, D., Wang, Z., Ho, D. W. C., & Wei, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2016.2582802 · Cited by 470
Strobel, V., Castelló Ferrer, E., & Dorigo, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00054 · Cited by 127
Laszka, A., Abbas, W., Vorobeychik, Y., & Koutsoukos, X. (2020) · Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1080/23335777.2019.1624620 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LeBlanc, H. J., Zhang, H., Koutsoukos, X., & Sundaram, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 766-781
- ISSN
- 0733-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973184571
- Cited by
- 730
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resilient Asymptotic Consensus in Robust Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsac.2013.130413
- The paper
- LeBlanc, H. J., Zhang, H., Koutsoukos, X., & Sundaram, S. (2013). Resilient Asymptotic Consensus in Robust Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2013.130413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.