The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic Artifact Rejection From Multichannel Scalp EEG by Wavelet ICA
Abstract
Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings are often contaminated by artifacts, i.e., signals with noncerebral origin that might mimic some cognitive or pathologic activity, this way affecting the clinical interpretation of traces. Artifact rejection is, thus, a key analysis for both visual inspection and digital processing of EEG. Automatic artifact rejection is needed for effective real time inspection because manual rejection is time consuming. In this paper, a novel technique (Automatic Wavelet Independent Component Analysis, AWICA) for automatic EEG artifact removal is presented. Through AWICA we claim to improve the performance and fully automate the process of artifact removal from scalp EEG. AWICA is based on the joint use of the Wavelet Transform and of ICA: it consists of a two-step procedure relying on the concepts of kurtosis and Renyi's entropy. Both synthesized and real EEG data are processed by AWICA and the results achieved were compared to the ones obtained by applying to the same data the “wavelet enhanced” ICA method recently proposed by other authors. Simulations illustrate that AWICA compares favorably to the other technique. The method here proposed is shown to yield improved success in terms of suppression of artifact components while reducing the loss of residual informative data, since the components related to relevant EEG activity are mostly preserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Daubechies, I., & Heil, C. (1992) · Computers in Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4823127 · Cited by 15,631
Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence
Brézillon, P., & Bouquet, P. (1999) · Cited by 7,473
Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data
Makeig, S., Bell, A. J., Jung, T., & B, T. J. S. A. (1995) · Cited by 1,957
Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004 · Cited by 1,759
Independent Component Analysis: Theory and Applications
Lee, T.-W. (2013) · Cited by 705
A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings
Schlögl, A., Keinrath, C., Zimmermann, D., Scherer, R., Leeb, R., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.003 · Cited by 575
Castellanos, N. P., & Makarov, V. A. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.05.033 · Cited by 569
Connectivity and complexity: the relationship between neuroanatomy and brain dynamics
Sporns, O., Tononi, G., & Edelman, G. M. (2000) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00053-8 · Cited by 541
Extended ICA Removes Artifacts from Electroencephalographic Recordings
Jung, T., Humphries, C., Lee, T.-W., Makeig, S., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V. J., & B, T. J. S. A. (1997) · Cited by 425
Cited by
Riaz, F., Hassan, A., Rehman, S., Niazi, I. K., & Dremstrup, K. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2015.2441835 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Mammone, N., La Foresta, F., & Morabito, F. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Sensors Journal
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 533-542
- ISSN
- 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1748
- OpenAlex
- W2049761669
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic Artifact Rejection From Multichannel Scalp EEG by Wavelet ICA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsen.2011.2115236
- The paper
- Mammone, N., La Foresta, F., & Morabito, F. C. (2012). Automatic Artifact Rejection From Multichannel Scalp EEG by Wavelet ICA. IEEE Sensors Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2011.2115236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.