Cited by 48Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques

A Study on Data Loss Compensation of WiFi-Based Wireless Sensor Networks for Structural Health Monitoring

Yu, Yan, Han, Feng, Bao, Yuequan, Ou, Jinping·2016·IEEE Sensors Journal

Abstract

In wireless data transmissions processes, data loss is an important factor that reduces the robustness of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In many practical engineering applications, data loss compensation algorithms are then required to maintain the robustness, and such algorithms are typically based on compressive sensing with a large memory of microcontrollers needed. This paper presents an improved algorithm, based on random demodulator, to overcome the difficulty of microcontroller-dependence in the traditional data loss algorithms. The newly developed algorithm demonstrates the following advantages: low space complexity; low floating-point calculations; and low time complexity. Therefore, it is more suitable to be embedded into ordinary nodes, comparing with the traditional algorithms. In this paper, a WSN based on WiFi is also developed for verifying the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed algorithm. Field experiment on Xinghai Bay Bridge is done. Experimental results show that the WSN works properly and steady. Moreover, the data loss can be compensated effectively and efficiently through the use of the present algorithm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsen.2015.2512846

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vulnerability of wireless communication channels can result in data loss during transmission, as well as errors in data analysis and prediction.

    “The vulnerability of wireless communication channels can result in data loss during transmission, as well as errors in data analysis and prediction [109].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y., Han, F., Bao, Y., & Ou, J.
Affiliations
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2016-05
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
3811-3818
ISSN
  • 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1748
  • 2379-9153
OpenAlex
W2340360321
Cited by
48
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (50921001, 51161120359)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB013705)
  • International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (2015DFG82080)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT15ZD117)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Keywords
wireless sensor networks, random demodulator, compressed sensing, structural health monitoring, space complexity, low-complexity algorithms, bridge monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review