A New Automated Signal Quality-Aware ECG Beat Classification Method for Unsupervised ECG Diagnosis Environments
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new automated quality-aware electrocardiogram (ECG) beat classification method for effective diagnosis of ECG arrhythmias under unsupervised healthcare environments. The proposed method consists of three major stages: 1) the ECG signal quality assessment (“acceptable” or “unacceptable”) based on our previous modified complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition and temporal features; 2) the ECG signal reconstruction and R-peak detection; and 3) the ECG beat classification including the ECG beat extraction, beat alignment, and normalized cross-correlation-based beat classification. The accuracy and robustness of the proposed method are evaluated using different normal and abnormal ECG signals taken from the standard MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. Evaluation results show that the proposed quality-aware ECG beat classification method can significantly achieve false alarm reduction ranging from 24% to 93% under noisy ECG recordings. The R-peak detector achieves the average Se = 99.67% and positive predictivity (Pp) = 93.10% and the average sensitivity (Se) = 99.65% and Pp = 98.88% without and with denoising approaches, respectively. Results further showed that the proposed ECG beat extraction approach can improve the classification accuracy by preserving the QRS complex portion and suppressing the background noises under acceptable level of noises. The quality-aware ECG beat classification methods achieve higher kappa values for the classification accu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several sources of noise exist in wearable data, arising from factors such as poor electrode contact with the skin, movement and muscle contraction during the ECG, and external electrical interference.
“Indeed, several sources of noise exist in wearable data, arising from factors such as poor electrode contact with the skin, movement and muscle contraction during the ECG, and external electrical interference16–19.”
From Detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction from single-lead electrocardiography adapted for portable and wearable devices (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khunte, A., Sangha, V., Oikonomou, E. K., Dhingra, L. S., Aminorroaya, A., Mortazavi, B. J., Coppi, A., Brandt, C. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Khera, R. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00869-w · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Satija, U., Ramkumar, B., & Manikandan, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Information Technology Dharwad (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar (IN)
- Venue
- IEEE Sensors Journal
- Published
- 2019-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 277-286
- ISSN
- 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1748
- 2379-9153
- OpenAlex
- W2897574883
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Keywords
- ECG beat classification, ECG signal quality assessment, complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition, R-peak detection, ECG denoising, normalized cross-correlation, MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, false alarm reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review