Cited by 102ECG Monitoring and AnalysisNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

A New Automated Signal Quality-Aware ECG Beat Classification Method for Unsupervised ECG Diagnosis Environments

Satija, Udit, Ramkumar, Barathram, Manikandan, M. Sabarimalai·2019·IEEE Sensors Journal

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new automated quality-aware electrocardiogram (ECG) beat classification method for effective diagnosis of ECG arrhythmias under unsupervised healthcare environments. The proposed method consists of three major stages: 1) the ECG signal quality assessment (“acceptable” or “unacceptable”) based on our previous modified complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition and temporal features; 2) the ECG signal reconstruction and R-peak detection; and 3) the ECG beat classification including the ECG beat extraction, beat alignment, and normalized cross-correlation-based beat classification. The accuracy and robustness of the proposed method are evaluated using different normal and abnormal ECG signals taken from the standard MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. Evaluation results show that the proposed quality-aware ECG beat classification method can significantly achieve false alarm reduction ranging from 24% to 93% under noisy ECG recordings. The R-peak detector achieves the average Se = 99.67% and positive predictivity (Pp) = 93.10% and the average sensitivity (Se) = 99.65% and Pp = 98.88% without and with denoising approaches, respectively. Results further showed that the proposed ECG beat extraction approach can improve the classification accuracy by preserving the QRS complex portion and suppressing the background noises under acceptable level of noises. The quality-aware ECG beat classification methods achieve higher kappa values for the classification accu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jsen.2018.2877055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satija, U., Ramkumar, B., & Manikandan, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Information Technology Dharwad (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar (IN)
Venue
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
277-286
ISSN
  • 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1748
  • 2379-9153
OpenAlex
W2897574883
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Sensors Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
ECG beat classification, ECG signal quality assessment, complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition, R-peak detection, ECG denoising, normalized cross-correlation, MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, false alarm reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review