The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A mm-Sized Implantable Medical Device (IMD) With Ultrasonic Power Transfer and a Hybrid Bi-Directional Data Link
Abstract
A first proof-of-concept mm-sized implantable device using ultrasonic power transfer and a hybrid bi-directional data communication link is presented. Ultrasonic power transfer enables miniaturization of the implant and operation deep inside the body, while still achieving safe and high power levels (100 μW to a few mWs) required for most implant applications. The current implant prototype measures 4 mm ×7.8 mm and is comprised of a piezoelectric receiver, an IC designed in 65 nm CMOS process and an off-chip antenna. The IC can support a maximum DC load of 100 μW for an incident acoustic intensity that is ~ 5% of the FDA diagnostic limit. This demonstrates the feasibility of providing further higher available DC power, potentially opening up new implant applications. The proposed hybrid bi-directional data link consists of ultrasonic downlink and RF uplink. Falling edge of the ultrasound input is detected as downlink data. The implant transmits an ultra-wideband (UWB) pulse sequence as uplink data, demonstrating capability of implementing an energy-efficient M-ary PPM transmitter in the future.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This implant supported a DC load up to 100 μW, suggesting the feasibility for higher available DC power levels between 100 μW to a few mWs (Charthad et al., 2015).”
From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Charthad et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“For example researchers at Stanford University featured an implant with dimensions of 4 mm × 7.8 mm that operated at an incident acoustic intensity within 5% of the FDA diagnostic limit.”
From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Charthad et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“This implant supported a DC load up to 100 μW, suggesting the feasibility for higher available DC power levels between 100 μW to a few mWs (Charthad et al., 2015).”
From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Charthad et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Antenna theory, analysis, and design
Croswell, W. F. (1982) · IRE Transactions on Telemetry and Remote Control · doi:10.1109/map.1982.27654 · Cited by 8,633
Gabriel, S., Lau, R.-W.-M., & Gabriel, C. (1996) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/002 · Cited by 4,487
Dickson, J. F. (1976) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.1976.1050739 · Cited by 1,692
Acoustic waves : devices, imaging, and analog signal processing
Kino, G. S. (1987) · Prentice Hall eBooks · Cited by 1,284
Fundamental Limitations of Small Antennas
Wheeler, H. A. (1947) · Proceedings of the IRE · doi:10.1109/jrproc.1947.226199 · Cited by 1,244
Analysis and Optimization of Switched-Capacitor DC–DC Converters
Seeman, M. D., & Sanders, S. R. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2007.915182 · Cited by 1,059
Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys
Nicolelis, M. A. L., Dimitrov, D., Carmena, J. M., Crist, R., Lehew, G., Kralik, J. D., & Wise, S. P. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1934665100 · Cited by 740
A jump-start for electroceuticals
Famm, K., Litt, B., Tracey, K. J., Boyden, E. S., & Slaoui, M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/496159a · Cited by 554
Implanted Neural Interfaces: Biochallenges and Engineered Solutions
Grill, W. M., Norman, S. E., & Bellamkonda, R. V. (2009) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124927 · Cited by 488
Capsule Endoscopy: From Current Achievements to Open Challenges
Ciuti, G., Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2011) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2011.2171182 · Cited by 467
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 2008, ?Information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers ?
- 2005, IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields 3 kHz to 300 GHz
- 1996, ?Guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radio frequency radiation ?
- 2013, Hybrid communication system for implantable devices and ultra-low power sensors based on U S Provisional Patent Application No 61822763
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wireless Recording in the Peripheral Nervous System with Ultrasonic Neural Dust
Seo, D., Neely, R. M., Shen, K., Singhal, U., Alon, E., Rabaey, J. M., Carmena, J. M., & Maharbiz, M. M. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.034 · Cited by 557
“In contrast to EM, ultrasound offers an attractive alternative for wirelessly powering and communicating with sub-mm implantable devices (Charthad et al., 2015; Larson and Towe, 2011; Meng and Sahin 2013; Ozeri and Shmilovitz, 2010; Seo et al., 2014).”
Wireless Power Transfer Strategies for Implantable Bioelectronics
Agarwal, K., Jegadeesan, R., Guo, Y., & Thakor, N. V. (2017) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2017.2683520 · Cited by 549
“A mm-sized IMD with UTET and hybrid bidirectional RF data communication link is presented in [92].”
MethodPiech, D. K., Johnson, B. C., Shen, K., Ghanbari, M. M., Li, K. Y., Neely, R. M., Kay, J. E., Carmena, J. M., Maharbiz, M. M., & Muller, R. (2020) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-020-0518-9 · Cited by 442
Wireless and battery-free technologies for neuroengineering
Won, S. M., Cai, L., Gutruf, P., & Rogers, J. A. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00683-3 · Cited by 360
A wireless millimetric magnetoelectric implant for the endovascular stimulation of peripheral nerves
Chen, J., Kan, P. T. M., Yu, Z., Alrashdan, F. T., Garcia, R., Singer, A. L., Lai, C. S. E., Avants, B., Crosby, S., Li, Z., et al. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00873-7 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Charthad, J., Weber, M. J., Chang, T. C., & Arbabian, A.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1741-1753
- ISSN
- 0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-173X
- OpenAlex
- W1583855207
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
- Keywords
- biomedical implants, ultrasonic power transfer, piezoelectric receiver, M-ary pulse position modulation, energy-efficient transmitter, 65 nm CMOS, device miniaturization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
