Cited by 18Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A 96.9-dB-Resolution 109-μW Second-Order Robust Closed-Loop VCO-Based Sensor Interface for Multiplexed Single-Ended Resistance Readout in 180-nm CMOS

Sacco, Elisa, Vergauwen, Johan, Gielen, Georges·2022·IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Abstract

This article presents a highly digital robust voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO)-based front end for multiplexed single-ended resistive sensor readout applications. The architecture features a modified digital phase-locked loop (DPLL) structure that enables second-order noise shaping without any operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs) and a single feedback digital-to-analog converter (DAC). The direct conversion of the sensor input resistance to time-domain information obviates the need for any conditioning circuit, thus resulting in a highly digital and area-compact architecture. The closed loop substantially reduces the amplitude of the signal at the VCO input, thereby achieving high linearity. To ensure high robustness against supply and temperature variations, a double measurement approach is employed. Fabricated in a 180-nm CMOS process with a 0.1-mm2active area, the sensor readout consumes 109$\mu \text{W}$of power and achieves a resolution of 96.9 dB for 0.5-ms conversion time, resulting in a Schreier figure of merit (FoM) of 166.5 dB. The circuit only requires a cheap and efficient single-point trimming calibration at room temperature. The low conversion time enables multiplexing among multiple sensor readouts. The supply and temperature sensitivities are 0.4%/V and 36 ppm/°C, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jssc.2022.3163284

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1007/978-3-642-18296-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/JSSC.2020.2989585 · DOI
  3. Oh, 2018, A 2.5 nJ duty-cycled bridge-to-digital converter integrated in a 13 mm3 pressure-sensing system, IEEE ISSCC Dig. Tech. Papers, 328
  4. Qu, 2018, A 0.28 mΩ-sensitivity 105 dB-dynamic-range electrochemical impedance spectroscopy SOC for electrochemical gas detection, IEEE ISSCC Dig. Tech. Papers, 286
  5. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2939615 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TCSI.2020.3047508 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/JSSC.2021.3057229 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/JSSC.2020.3043669 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/JSSC.2013.2245058 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2949725 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/JSSC.2012.2197929 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TCSI.2021.3065503 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/VLSIC.2018.8502343 · DOI
  14. 10.23919/VLSIC.2017.8008471 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/JSSC.2018.2885556 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TVLSI.2019.2895361 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/ESSCIRC.2019.8902918 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TCSII.2019.2913668 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TCSI.2014.2334932 · DOI
  20. 10.23919/VLSIC.2019.8778126 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/JSSC.2020.3037833 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/JSSC.2013.2274831 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/JSSC.2019.2911888 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/JSSC.2020.2987692 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/JSSC.2019.2948008 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/TCSI.2019.2898415 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/LSSC.2018.2875818 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/JSSC.2012.2225738 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/JSSC.2009.2032703 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TCSI.2021.3073817 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/9780470546772 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/SMACD.2018.8434910 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/JSSC.2007.905240 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/16.47770 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/16.108195 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/ICECS49266.2020.9294842 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/4.165341 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/TCSI.2008.2001761 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/82.204108 · DOI
  40. 2022, NTC thermistor B57891S

Metadata

Authors
Sacco, E., Vergauwen, J., & Gielen, G.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Melexis (Belgium) (BE)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Published
2022-09
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
2764-2777
ISSN
  • 0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-173X
OpenAlex
W4226075554
Cited by
18
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vlaams Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen (VLAIO), Belgium
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Keywords
voltage-controlled oscillator, digital phase-locked loop, second-order noise shaping, multiplexed readout, low-power analog front-end, 0.18 μm CMOS, calibration, Schreier figure of merit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review