Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LiDAR Point Clouds to 3-D Urban Models$:$ A Review

Wang, Ruisheng, Peethambaran, Jiju, Chen, Dong·2018·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3-D) urban models are an integral part of numerous applications, such as urban planning and performance simulation, mapping and visualization, emergency response training and entertainment, among others. We consolidate various algorithms proposed for reconstructing 3-D models of urban objects from point clouds. Urban models addressed in this review include buildings, vegetation, utilities such as roads or power lines and free-form architectures such as curved buildings or statues, all of which are ubiquitous in a typical urban scenario. While urban modeling, building reconstruction, in particular, clearly demand specific traits in the models, such as regularity, symmetry, and repetition; most of the traditional and state-of-the-art 3-D reconstruction algorithms are designed to address very generic objects of arbitrary shapes and topology. The recent efforts in the urban reconstruction arena, however, strive to accommodate the various pressing needs of urban modeling. Strategically, urban modeling research nowadays focuses on the usage of specialized priors, such as global regularity, Manhattan-geometry or symmetry to aid the reconstruction, or efficient adaptation of existing reconstruction techniques to the urban modeling pipeline. Aimed at an in-depth exploration of further possibilities, we review the existing urban reconstruction algorithms, prevalent in computer graphics, computer vision and photogrammetry disciplines, evaluate their performance in the architectural modeling context, and discuss the adaptability of generic mesh reconstruction techniques to the urban modeling pipeline. In the end, we suggest a few directions of research that may be adopted to close in the technology gaps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jstars.2017.2781132

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Metadata

Authors
Wang, R., Peethambaran, J., & Chen, D.
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Published
2018-02
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
606-627
ISSN
  • 1939-1404 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-1535
OpenAlex
W2785825007
Cited by
319
References
100
FWCI
27.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LiDAR Point Clouds to 3-D Urban Models$:$ A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jstars.2017.2781132
The paper
Wang, R., Peethambaran, J., & Chen, D. (2018). LiDAR Point Clouds to 3-D Urban Models$:$ A Review. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2017.2781132

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.