The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of CYGNSS Wind Speed Retrieval Uncertainty
Abstract
Measurements of near surface wind speed made by the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) constellation of GNSS-R satellites are evaluated and their uncertainty is assessed in two ways. A bottom-up assessment begins with a model for the error in engineering measurements and propagates that error through the wind speed retrieval algorithm analytically. A top-down assessment performs a statistical comparison between CYGNSS measurements and coincident “ground truth” measurements of wind speed. Results of the two approaches are compared. Overall performance, as determined by the top-down method, is decomposed using the bottom-up approach into its contributing sources of error. Overall root mean square (RMS) uncertainty in the CYGNSS retrievals is 1.4 m/s at wind speeds below 20 m/s. At higher wind speeds, an increase in the retrieval error is primarily caused by a decrease in the sensitivity of the ocean scattering cross section to changes in wind speed. In tropical cyclones, retrieval errors are compounded by unaccounted departures from a fully developed sea state. Overall RMS uncertainty in the CYGNSS retrievals is 17% at wind speeds above 20 m/s.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bistatic radar data contains signatures that have been used for wide-ranging Earth Science applications, including measuring ocean surface wind speeds, soil moisture, inland water body mapping, river width and surface slope estimation.
“The bistatic radar data contains signatures that have been used for wide-ranging Earth Science applications, including measuring ocean surface wind speeds [4], soil moisture [5][6][7], inland water body mapping [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], and river width [16] and surface slope [17] estimation.”
From Characterization of River Width Measurement Capability by Space Borne GNSS-Reflectometry (2024) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- gleason, 0, The CYGNSS level 1 calibration algorithm and error analysis based on on-orbit measurements, IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens
- 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2541343 · DOI
- ruf, 2016, CYGNSS Handbook
- wang, 0, Design and performance of a GPS constellation power monitor system for improved CYGNSS L1B calibration, IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens
- ruf, 0, Development of the CYGNSS geophysical model function for wind speed, IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens
- 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2303831 · DOI
- andersson, 2015, User Guide to ECMWF Forecast Products, ECMWF v2 1, 121
- 10.1175/MWR3454.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2643641 · DOI
- 10.1080/2150704X.2012.693967 · DOI
- 10.1002/2015GL064204 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2230401 · DOI
- 10.1109/MGRS.2013.2260911 · DOI
- 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00218.1 · DOI
- 10.1109/36.729357 · DOI
- 10.1029/96JC01751 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2502245 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2027896 · DOI
- hersbach, 2008, CMOD5.N: A C-band geophysical model function for equivalent neutral wind, ECMWF Technical Memorandum
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2685432 · DOI
- verhoef, 2008, CMOD5.n—The CMOD5 GMF for Neutral Winds, EUMETSAT Tech Note SAF/OSI/CDOP/KNMI/TEC/TN/165, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Characterization of River Width Measurement Capability by Space Borne GNSS-Reflectometry
Warnock, A., Ruf, C. S., & Knoll, A. L. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16081446 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruf, C. S., Gleason, S., & McKague, D. S.
- ORCID
- Ruf, Christopher S.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-97
- ISSN
- 1939-1404
- 2151-1535
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 0
- Licence
- Funders
- Science Mission Directorate (NNL13AQ00C)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review